No More Tears: The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson (2025)

newsroom

Oct 14, 2025 - 06:27

0 1

No More Tears: The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson (2025)

Johnson & Johnson lives in every American home—the baby shampoo that doesn't sting, the Band-Aids on skinned knees, the Tylenol for fevers. For 140 years, they've wrapped themselves in the imagery of motherhood and healing, their products touching families at their most vulnerable moments. But internal documents and court records reveal something monstrous: this trusted household name operates as one of history's most successful corporate serial killers. They knew their baby powder contained asbestos that would kill thousands of women with ovarian cancer, yet sold it for fifty years while destroying lab results and threatening researchers. They paid Harvard doctors to diagnose toddlers with psychiatric disorders that don't exist in children, then drugged them with antipsychotics that caused 60,000 boys to grow permanent breasts. They supplied 80% of the raw opioid materials that fueled America's overdose epidemic while simultaneously marketing their own fentanyl patches as non-addictive. The death toll from J&J products likely exceeds two million Americans—more than all U.S. combat deaths in every war combined—yet they remain Fortune's "most admired" pharmaceutical company, their executives celebrated at White House events, their criminal convictions forgotten behind a wall of advertising and Harvard Business School case studies about their "ethical" crisis management.

The pattern never changes: J&J discovers their product is killing people, calculates that profits exceed potential lawsuit costs, then spends decades destroying evidence while bodies accumulate. When their own scientist found that the cancer drug Procrit actually fed tumors through EPO receptors, executives responded, "we have to kill this work"—and they did, burying research showing the drug shortened cancer patients' lives by months or years. When elderly patients in nursing homes were dying from off-label Risperdal prescriptions, J&J created an "ElderCare" sales force that threw ice cream socials for staff while paying Omnicare $280 million in kickbacks to drug confused residents who couldn't refuse. When their metal-on-metal hip implants shed millions of toxic cobalt particles into patients' bloodstreams, causing heart failure and blindness, they celebrated reaching $1 billion in sales while hiding failure rates approaching 40%. Even the celebrated 1982 Tylenol recall—taught in business schools as exemplary crisis management—was actually a masterclass in manipulation. J&J had ignored warnings about tamper-vulnerable packaging because grocery stores were more profitable than pharmacies, initially refused any recall until public pressure became unbearable, then spent $100 million spinning the disaster into a reputation-laundering triumph that still protects them today.

This isn't a story of corporate mistakes or regulatory failures—it's the inevitable result of a system working exactly as designed. The FDA depends on J&J's money for 75% of its drug division budget, making the agency a paid subsidiary rather than a regulator. Medical schools and journals survive on J&J funding, producing "research" that's actually ghostwritten marketing. Doctors who take hundreds of thousands in "consulting fees" can't criticize their benefactor without implicating themselves. Politicians who receive campaign contributions block reforms while prosecutors negotiate settlements that let executives walk free. The Wall Street Journal editorial board attacks the FDA as overly aggressive, creating a mythology of strict regulation that shields J&J from scrutiny. Even now, facing 100,000 lawsuits from cancer victims, J&J has pioneered using bankruptcy law as a weapon—creating shell companies to absorb liability while their $400 billion empire remains untouchable, victims dying while waiting for justice that will never come. They've proven the ultimate American truth: with enough money and good PR, mass murder isn't a crime—it's a business model.

With thanks to Gardiner Harris.

No More Tears: The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson: Harris, Gardiner

Deep Dive Conversation Library (Bonus for Paid Subscribers Only)

This deep dive is based on the book:

Discussion No.124:

Insights and reflections from “No More Tears: The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson”

Thank you for your support.

Analogy

Johnson & Johnson is like a beloved family doctor who has treated your family for generations - the one with the warm smile, gentle hands, and waiting room full of children's drawings. Everyone in town swears by this doctor, from the mayor to your grandmother. Harvard Medical School has case studies about their exceptional bedside manner. They delivered you, treated your childhood illnesses, and you trust them with your own children.

But hidden in the doctor's locked basement is a laboratory where they've been deliberately poisoning patients for decades. They prescribe medicines they know cause cancer, perform surgeries that cripple, and inject children with drugs that deform them - all while keeping meticulous notes on the damage. When patients sicken, the doctor expresses concern and prescribes more poison as treatment. When victims die, the doctor consoles grieving families at funerals.

Occasionally someone discovers the truth, but the doctor pays them to stay quiet or destroys their reputation. The medical board, funded by the doctor's donations, looks the other way. The local newspaper, dependent on the doctor's advertising, won't investigate. Other doctors, trained and paid by this doctor, insist their colleague is beyond reproach. Even when caught red-handed, the doctor simply pays a fine and continues practicing, while the town continues singing their praises.

The truly horrifying part isn't just the deliberate harm - it's that everyone remains convinced this monster is a healer, sending their children for treatment, grateful for the doctor's care even as family members die mysteriously. The doctor's evil genius was understanding that with enough good reputation, white coats, and advertising, people will trust you with their lives even while you're ending them.

The One-Minute Elevator Explanation

Imagine if the company that makes your baby shampoo and Tylenol was actually one of America's biggest criminal enterprises. Johnson & Johnson - that trusted name in every medicine cabinet - has killed more Americans than died in World War II through deliberately selling products they knew were deadly. They put asbestos in baby powder for 50 years knowing it caused cancer. They turned the Tylenol murders into a PR triumph while fighting safety measures. They paid doctors to drug toddlers with antipsychotics that gave 60,000 boys permanent breasts. They supplied 80% of the raw materials for America's opioid epidemic while lying that their fentanyl patches weren't addictive.

The real scandal isn't just the murders - it's the system that enables them. The FDA is funded by J&J. Medical schools depend on their money. Doctors get rich prescribing their drugs. The Wall Street Journal writes editorials defending them. Politicians they fund refuse to prosecute. Even after paying billions in criminal fines, they're still celebrated as "America's most admired company." They've proven you can kill millions and remain respectable if you have enough money and good PR.

[Elevator dings]

Want to dig deeper? Follow three threads: First, search "Johnson & Johnson talc documents" to see internal memos proving they knew baby powder contained asbestos. Second, look up "J&J Risperdal whistleblower cases" to understand how they illegally drugged children. Third, research "pharmaceutical industry FDA user fees" to see how drug companies captured their own regulator.

12-Point Summary

1. A Criminal Enterprise Disguised as Healthcare Johnson & Johnson operates as one of history's most successful criminal organizations, having killed an estimated two million people while maintaining a pristine public image. Unlike typical criminals who hide their activities, J&J commits crimes in plain sight, protected by a system they've thoroughly corrupted. They've paid over $4 billion in criminal penalties since 1991, treating these fines as operating expenses while no executive has faced personal prosecution. The company demonstrates that with enough advertising spend and political connections, mass murder becomes just another business strategy in American capitalism.

2. The Baby Powder Cancer Cover-Up For over 50 years, J&J sold baby powder they knew was contaminated with asbestos, a deadly carcinogen. Internal documents from the 1960s show executives discussing contamination levels of 1-3%, while publicly declaring their product "asbestos-free." They created a deliberately flawed testing method called J4-1 designed to miss asbestos, threatened researchers who found contamination, destroyed documents, and had executives commit perjury to hide the truth. Thousands of women died from ovarian cancer, with victims as young as 21, all while J&J marketed the powder specifically for feminine hygiene knowing genital use was most dangerous.

3. The Tylenol Mythology Machine The 1982 cyanide poisonings that killed seven Chicago residents created J&J's most powerful asset: a false reputation for ethical crisis management. In reality, J&J had ignored warnings about tamper-vulnerable packaging because grocery stores were more profitable than pharmacies. They initially refused recalls, only acting under massive public pressure. The company then spent $100 million on PR to rewrite history, creating the Harvard Business School case study that still teaches executives today. This manufactured mythology gave J&J a "halo effect" that protected them from scrutiny during subsequent decades of criminal activity.

4. Weaponizing Mental Health Against Children J&J created a market for the antipsychotic Risperdal by essentially inventing childhood bipolar disorder. They paid Harvard's Dr. Joseph Biederman $1.6 million to diagnose toddlers with a condition that doesn't exist in young children, increasing diagnoses 40-fold. The company knew Risperdal caused massive weight gain, diabetes, and in boys, permanent breast growth requiring mastectomies - with internal studies showing 5.5% of boys developed breasts while they told doctors the rate was under 0.1%. They created colorful marketing materials with cartoon characters to make drugging children seem friendly, ultimately causing 60,000 boys to grow breasts.

5. Turning Cancer Treatment into Cancer Acceleration Procrit/EPO was marketed as helping cancer patients survive chemotherapy by boosting red blood cells, but J&J knew it fed tumors. Their own researchers discovered cancer cells had EPO receptors, meaning the drug could accelerate cancer growth. When a Harvard scientist presented these findings at J&J headquarters, executives said "we have to kill this work." They buried studies showing patients died months or years sooner, while paying oncologists over $100,000 annually in kickbacks to prescribe it. FDA advisors concluded that for every 100 cancer patients treated, one would die who otherwise would have lived - meaning thousands of cancer deaths.

6. Engineering the Opioid Epidemic from Seed to Cemetery While Purdue Pharma gets blamed for OxyContin, J&J was the opioid epidemic's foundation, growing mutant poppies in Tasmania to supply 80% of the world's oxycodone ingredients. They created the crisis's intellectual framework in the 1980s by funding "pain societies" that spread the lie that opioids rarely cause addiction. With their fentanyl drug Duragesic, they told doctors it was less addictive than pills while internal documents showed extensive abuse and overdoses. They even created "Project Pearl" with Purdue to jointly expand opioid prescribing. An Oklahoma judge called them the "kingpin" of an epidemic that killed 500,000 Americans.

7. Medical Devices as Torture Instruments J&J's medical devices turned routine surgeries into lifetime disabilities. Their metal-on-metal hip implants, never tested in humans, shed millions of toxic particles causing cobalt poisoning, blindness, heart failure, and massive internal tumors. Vaginal mesh, made from heavy hernia plastic, eroded through women's organs causing excruciating pain and destroying sexual function. When devices failed catastrophically, J&J created a new business model: selling replacement parts to fix their own defective products, profiting twice from each victim. Internal emails showed executives celebrating billion-dollar sales while knowing failure rates approached 40%.

8. The Systematic Corruption of American Medicine J&J transformed medicine from healing profession to drug-dealing operation by capturing every institution meant to protect patients. They fund 75% of FDA's drug division budget, making the regulator dependent on the industry it oversees. They pay medical schools, turning professors into sales representatives. They ghost-write medical journal articles and create fake journals. They fund medical societies that write guidelines recommending J&J products. Over 80% of continuing medical education about their drugs is company-funded propaganda. This systemic corruption means most medical "knowledge" about J&J products is actually marketing disguised as science.

9. Exploiting the Vulnerable as Business Strategy J&J specifically targets those who cannot advocate for themselves: babies who can't speak, elderly with dementia who can't refuse, women too embarrassed to discuss intimate injuries, and children whose parents trust doctors. They paid nursing home chains $280 million in kickbacks to drug confused elderly residents. They marketed vaginal mesh knowing women wouldn't complain about sexual dysfunction. They sold asbestos-contaminated powder for babies knowing parents would never suspect a beloved brand. Internal documents called these groups "high-value populations" because they used products long-term and had limited ability to pursue legal action.

10. The Bankruptcy Shield Innovation Facing 100,000 lawsuits from cancer victims, J&J pioneered using bankruptcy to avoid accountability while remaining profitable. They created the "Texas Two-Step" - forming a subsidiary called LTL Management, transferring all talc liability to it, then having it declare bankruptcy while J&J's $400 billion value remained untouched. This froze victims' lawsuits for years while many died waiting for justice. They simultaneously spun off their consumer division as Kenvue Inc., attempting to further distance themselves from products that killed. This strategy treats cancer victims as financial engineering problems rather than humans they poisoned.

11. The Whistleblower Persecution System Those who expose J&J's crimes face systematic destruction. The company hires private investigators to follow whistleblowers and dig up dirt. They bury them in legal fees through endless depositions. They blacklist them from the industry. Sales rep Vicki Starr, who exposed illegal Risperdal marketing, was fired and harassed. Researcher Arthur Langer, who found asbestos in baby powder, saw his institution threatened with funding loss. Yet these heroes recovered billions for taxpayers through False Claims Act suits. Without them, J&J's crimes would remain hidden, as regulatory agencies are too captured to act.

12. The Lesson for American Capitalism Johnson & Johnson proves that in America, you can kill millions and remain respectable if you have enough money and good PR. They've shown that corporate mass murder is not only possible but profitable, as long as you maintain advertising budgets, fund politicians, and keep stock prices high. Their enduring reputation as "most admired" despite being a convicted serial felon demonstrates that American capitalism has no moral bottom - any atrocity is acceptable if quarterly earnings meet expectations. J&J isn't an aberration but the logical endpoint of a system that values profits over lives, revealing that our entire healthcare system is designed to enable corporate predation rather than prevent it.

The Golden Nugget

The most profound revelation that few people know is that Johnson & Johnson deliberately created the J4-1 testing protocol in the 1970s - an industry-wide standard for detecting asbestos in talc that was specifically designed to miss contamination. When faced with proof their baby powder contained cancer-causing asbestos, they didn't reformulate the product or switch to corn starch as their own scientists recommended. Instead, they engineered a testing method with detection limits set just above the contamination levels they knew existed, allowing them to declare their product "asbestos-free" while knowing it wasn't. This test became the industry standard, meaning every company using it could claim their talc was safe while knowing the test was rigged. It's perhaps history's most diabolical example of weaponized methodology - they didn't just hide evidence of killing babies, they created a scientific framework that made the killing invisible and gave them legal cover to continue for another 50 years.

30 Questions and Answers

Question 1: How did Johnson & Johnson knowingly contaminate millions of babies with asbestos for decades through its Baby Powder?

Johnson & Johnson discovered in the 1950s and 1960s that its talc mines in Vermont were contaminated with asbestos, with internal testing showing contamination levels between 1-3%. When the company purchased Vermont talc mines in 1964, one was located just yards from an asbestos mine, and company executives knew that talc and asbestos are so chemically and geologically similar that veins of one are often ribboned with the other. Rather than switching to corn starch as recommended by their own research director in 1973, J&J created a testing method called J4-1 that was deliberately designed to miss small amounts of asbestos, allowing them to falsely declare their product "asbestos-free."

For over 50 years, the company systematically hid evidence, with executives lying under oath and destroying documents. When Mount Sinai researchers found asbestos in Baby Powder in the 1970s, J&J threatened to cut funding to the medical school unless the findings were suppressed. The contamination has led to thousands of cases of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, with victims as young as 21 dying from a product marketed specifically for babies.

Question 2: What was the truth behind the 1982 Tylenol poisoning case that made Johnson & Johnson famous for ethical crisis management?

The widely celebrated story of J&J's exemplary response to the 1982 cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules that killed seven people in Chicago is largely mythology. Harvard Business School case studies praise the company for immediately pulling product nationwide, but in reality, J&J initially refused recalls and only acted after enormous public pressure. Internal documents show executives knew their distribution system enabled the poisonings - they had been warned that selling Tylenol in food stores without tamper-resistant packaging was dangerous, but refused to change because grocery stores generated higher profits than pharmacies.

The company spent over $100 million on PR to reshape the narrative while fighting against tamper-resistant packaging requirements. FDA Commissioner Arthur Hayes, who praised J&J's response, was later revealed to be corrupt and left the agency in disgrace. Most tellingly, J&J used the crisis to transition from capsules to solid tablets, which were cheaper to produce, turning disaster into profit while seven families mourned their dead.

Question 3: How did Johnson & Johnson illegally market the antipsychotic drug Risperdal to children and elderly patients, causing devastating side effects?

J&J launched Risperdal with a deliberate strategy to illegally expand beyond its FDA approval for schizophrenia in adults. The company created "ElderCare" and "500 Gold" sales forces specifically to target nursing homes, where sales reps organized "ice cream and popcorn parties" to push the drug for dementia despite FDA rejections. For children, J&J paid Harvard's Dr. Joseph Biederman over $1.6 million to promote childhood bipolar disorder - essentially inventing a disease to create a market. Sales materials instructed reps to "sell on symptoms, not diagnosis," explicitly violating federal law.

The consequences were catastrophic: at least 60,000 boys grew permanent breasts requiring double mastectomies, elderly patients died from diabetes and strokes at dramatically increased rates, and children as young as two were drugged into submission. Internal studies showed 5.5% of boys developed breasts, but J&J hid this data while claiming the rate was under 0.1%. When sales reps tried to warn about deaths in nursing homes, they were fired or silenced. By 2004, Risperdal generated $3.1 billion annually, making it worth the eventual $2.2 billion criminal penalty.

Question 4: How did Johnson & Johnson's EPO/Procrit, marketed as a miracle drug for cancer patients, actually accelerate tumor growth and cause thousands of deaths?

Procrit was supposed to help cancer patients by boosting their red blood cells during chemotherapy, but J&J knew from early research that EPO receptors existed on cancer cells themselves, potentially feeding tumor growth. The company's own scientist in Greece discovered this fatal flaw, and when a Harvard researcher presented findings that EPO stimulated cancer growth at J&J headquarters, executives said "we have to kill this work." Despite mounting evidence, J&J pushed for higher doses and broader use, paying oncologists massive kickbacks - some received over $100,000 annually just for prescribing Procrit.

By 2007, massive studies proved what J&J had hidden: cancer patients given EPO died significantly sooner than those who received blood transfusions. The drug shortened lives by months or years while generating $3.4 billion annually at its peak. FDA advisors concluded that for every 100 cancer patients treated with EPO, one would die who otherwise would have lived - meaning thousands of cancer patients died prematurely. Yet J&J never faced criminal charges for these deaths, only civil penalties that were a fraction of profits.

Question 5: What role did Johnson & Johnson play in creating and fueling America's opioid epidemic?

While Purdue Pharma gets most blame for the opioid crisis, J&J was actually the epidemic's foundation. The company owned poppy farms in Tasmania, becoming the world's largest supplier of raw narcotic materials - the "kingpin," as one attorney called it. J&J grew mutant poppies with extra-high opioid content, supplying 80% of the active ingredients for oxycodone and hydrocodone pills. But J&J went beyond just supply: it launched the opioid crisis's philosophical framework in the 1980s by funding "pain societies" that pushed the lie that opioids rarely cause addiction.

With Duragesic fentanyl patches, J&J told doctors the drug was less addictive than pills because of slow release, while internal documents showed they knew patches were extensively abused and causing overdoses. The company created "Project Pearl" with Purdue to jointly expand opioid prescribing. Even after Purdue pled guilty to criminal charges in 2007, J&J launched another opioid, Nucynta, marketed with the same deadly lies. A judge found J&J's actions were "a cynical, calculated effort to create confusion and influence prescribing physicians," contributing to 500,000 American deaths.

Question 6: How did Johnson & Johnson's metal-on-metal hip implants poison thousands of patients with cobalt while the company lied about safety?

J&J's DePuy unit revived a catastrophically failed 1960s design - metal-on-metal hips - despite knowing they shed millions of toxic metal particles into patients' bodies. The company never tested the Pinnacle or ASR XL implants in humans before selling them, instead using a regulatory loophole. When British surgeons reported 16% failure rates and patients developing massive internal tumors from metal debris, J&J lied and said problems weren't seen elsewhere. Internal emails showed executives knew the hips were failing catastrophically but celebrated reaching $1 billion in sales.

Patients suffered cobalt and chromium poisoning that destroyed hip tissue, caused heart failure, blindness, deafness, and cognitive damage. Many needed multiple revision surgeries that destroyed so much bone that walking became impossible. Instead of recalling the devices, J&J created a new business model: selling replacement parts to fix their own defective implants, profiting twice from each victim. Marketing featured Coach K claiming 99.9% success rates while internal data showed failure rates approaching 40%. Over 10,000 lawsuits resulted, with juries awarding billions in damages for J&J's "intentional misrepresentations."

Question 7: How did Johnson & Johnson's vaginal mesh implants destroy women's lives while the company manipulated medical societies to keep selling?

J&J aggressively marketed vaginal mesh as a simple fix for pelvic organ prolapse, training doctors in weekend courses to implant these devices despite knowing they caused severe complications. The mesh was made from heavy plastic designed for hernias, not delicate vaginal tissue. It routinely eroded through vaginal walls, cut into bladders and bowels, and caused excruciating pain that destroyed sexual function and basic mobility. One surgeon reported that 90% of conference attendees had performed emergency surgeries to remove mesh, yet J&J kept selling.

When the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published warnings that mesh should be considered "experimental," J&J used paid consultants to get the bulletin reversed. An executive wrote "I AM DOING THE HAPPY DANCE!!!! I LOVE YOU MAN!!!" when they succeeded. Dr. Peggy Norton, whose office was flooded with mesh victims, begged J&J to stop selling to untrained doctors, but the company refused. Women required multiple surgeries attempting removal, but mesh scars into tissue so severely that complete removal is often impossible, leaving women permanently disabled.

Question 8: How did the FDA evolve from a public protector into a captured agency that enables Johnson & Johnson's crimes?

The FDA's transformation began in the 1990s when Congress, pressured by industry, made the agency dependent on pharmaceutical company "user fees" for its budget. Today, 75% of FDA's drug division funding comes from the companies it regulates. This created a system where the FDA sees drugmakers as "clients" rather than entities to police. When J&J sought approval for dangerous drugs, FDA officials who raised concerns were overruled or transferred. The agency has never permanently barred J&J from any market despite repeated felony convictions.

The revolving door is stunning: FDA officials who approved J&J's drugs later took high-paying jobs at the company, while J&J executives moved into FDA leadership. When Alex Gorsky was being confirmed as J&J CEO, an FDA official emailed asking if she could attend his party, calling herself a "long-time admirer." The FDA takes over a year to issue warning letters for illegal marketing, by which time damage is done. From 1991-2015, J&J paid over $4 billion in criminal and civil penalties, yet FDA never suspended its ability to sell drugs - treating billions in fines as just the cost of doing business.

Question 9: How did The Wall Street Journal's editorial page help create the myth of FDA as tough regulator while actually serving industry interests?

For decades, the Wall Street Journal editorial page has relentlessly attacked the FDA as overly aggressive and anti-industry, creating a false narrative that helps companies like J&J. When FDA created drug safety programs at industry's request to avoid liability, the Journal portrayed them as government overreach. When FDA gave drugmakers billions in patent extensions for testing drugs in children, the Journal called it anti-business regulation. This deliberate misrepresentation has been so consistent that the editorial board won a Pulitzer Prize for pieces slamming the FDA.

The Journal's campaign has profound effects: it convinces doctors, patients, and even judges that if products are FDA-approved, they must be safe because everyone "knows" the FDA is super tough. This mythology provides cover for J&J's crimes. When people are harmed, they assume it couldn't be the company's fault since the "strict" FDA approved it. The Journal writers are intelligent enough to know they're misleading readers, making their consistent "errors" appear intentional - serving to hide FDA's actual transformation into an industry servant.

Question 10: What methods did Johnson & Johnson use to corrupt doctors and turn them into drug pushers?

J&J perfected the art of physician bribery through "consulting" agreements, "advisory boards," and "research" payments that were actually kickbacks for prescriptions. Top prescribers of Risperdal received over $100,000 annually in speaking fees to give talks written by J&J. The company tracked every doctor's prescriptions weekly, adjusting payments based on performance. Doctors who stopped prescribing lost their lucrative agreements. One psychiatrist received $490,000 over four years; another got paid for 150 talks in 18 months - physically impossible to deliver.

The corruption went deeper through "seeding trials" - fake research studies designed solely to get doctors prescribing. J&J would pay physicians $1,000 per patient enrolled in "studies" that had no scientific value but created financial dependency. The company funded over 80% of continuing medical education about their drugs, controlling what doctors learned. They ghostwrote medical journal articles, paying prestigious doctors to add their names as authors. This system was so effective that by 2003, six of J&J's seven top drugs involved illegal kickback schemes.

Question 11: How did document destruction and perjury become standard practice at Johnson & Johnson?

J&J developed sophisticated systems for destroying evidence of wrongdoing. When asbestos was found in Vermont talc mines, the company orchestrated a document purge with lawyer involvement to claim attorney-client privilege. Executives signed false affidavits swearing talc was asbestos-free when they knew it was contaminated. Laboratory notebooks had pages physically ripped out. When Engelhard company's executive revealed under oath that J&J's former mine contained asbestos, both companies collaborated to destroy all records and create fake documents showing the mines were clean.

This pattern repeated across products: when Risperdal caused diabetes, documents showing the company knew this were destroyed. When Procrit killed cancer patients, studies showing tumor growth acceleration disappeared. J&J even created a "midnight crew" to secretly remove defective Tylenol from stores without documentation. Courts have repeatedly sanctioned J&J for destroying evidence, but penalties are minimal compared to profits protected. One judge noted J&J's "pattern of egregious discovery misconduct," but the company treats litigation sanctions as just another business expense.

Question 12: Who were the key whistleblowers who risked everything to expose Johnson & Johnson's crimes?

Vicki Starr, a Risperdal sales rep, was first to file suit in 2004 after witnessing elderly patients dying and children being illegally drugged. She secretly recorded meetings where managers instructed illegal sales tactics. FDA investigator Frances Kelsey became famous for blocking thalidomide, showing one person could save thousands. Mount Sinai researcher Arthur Langer exposed asbestos in Baby Powder despite J&J threatening his institution's funding. Sales rep Janet Auden reported illegal Risperdal marketing to children and was fired, then won her whistleblower case.

These heroes faced retaliation: firings, blacklisting, lawsuits, and threats. J&J hired private investigators to follow whistleblowers and dig up dirt. Company lawyers would bury them in legal fees through endless depositions. Yet whistleblowers recovered over $2 billion for taxpayers through False Claims Act cases. Without them, J&J's crimes would remain hidden. As one said: "I couldn't look at myself in the mirror knowing what was happening to those children." Their courage exposed systematic criminality that regulatory agencies refused to see.

Question 13: How did Johnson & Johnson exploit the most vulnerable populations - children, elderly, and women?

J&J specifically targeted populations who couldn't advocate for themselves. For children, they paid doctors to diagnose toddlers with bipolar disorder to justify antipsychotic drugging. The company created colorful Risperdal promotional items with cartoon characters. For the elderly with dementia, J&J sales reps organized parties in nursing homes, knowing confused residents couldn't refuse medication. They paid Omnicare, which controlled pharmacy services for millions of nursing home residents, $280 million in kickbacks to push their drugs on captive populations.

For women, J&J marketed vaginal mesh to busy OB-GYNs as a quick surgical fix, knowing complications would appear months later when women would be too embarrassed to complain about intimate injuries. They sold birth control patches with blood clot risks 60% higher than pills without warnings. They marketed talcum powder specifically for feminine hygiene, knowing women would use it on their genitals where asbestos causes ovarian cancer. This targeting was deliberate - internal documents called these groups "high-value populations" because they used products long-term and had limited ability to pursue legal action.

Question 14: What was the true death toll from Johnson & Johnson products, and why don't we know the exact number?

Conservative estimates suggest J&J products have killed over two million people. The opioid epidemic, substantially fueled by J&J, killed 500,000 Americans. Vioxx, which J&J sold internationally, killed up to 140,000. Procrit likely killed thousands of cancer patients. Risperdal caused thousands of elderly deaths from stroke and diabetes. Baby Powder caused thousands of cancer deaths over 50 years. Tylenol kills 150-500 Americans annually. Defective birth control patches, hip implants, vaginal mesh, and heart devices killed thousands more.

The true number is unknowable because J&J systematically hides death data. The FDA's adverse event reporting system captures less than 10% of deaths. J&J instructs doctors that deaths are "coincidental" unless proven otherwise. The company destroys documents, settles cases with secrecy agreements, and uses bankruptcy to hide liability. They even created subsidiary companies to absorb liability then declare bankruptcy, shielding death statistics from public view. As one executive wrote: "Dead patients don't file lawsuits."

Question 15: How did Alex Gorsky rise through Johnson & Johnson despite overseeing multiple criminal schemes?

Alex Gorsky joined J&J in 1988 and quickly distinguished himself by his willingness to push legal boundaries. As head of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, he oversaw illegal Risperdal marketing to children and elderly, personally presenting plans to "grow and protect share in child/adolescents" despite lacking FDA approval. When whistleblowers filed suits in 2004, Gorsky conveniently left for Novartis, returning in 2008 after heat died down. He oversaw Duragesic marketing that fueled the opioid epidemic and was involved in hiding Procrit's cancer deaths.

Despite this record, Gorsky was promoted to CEO in 2012 and chairman in 2016. Under his leadership, J&J paid billions in criminal penalties while he received $150 million in compensation. In 2021, President Biden publicly praised Gorsky at a White House event, calling him a partner in fighting COVID-19. Gorsky's career proves that at J&J, executives who generate profits through criminal activity are rewarded, not punished. He retired with honors in 2022, never facing personal prosecution for overseeing schemes that killed thousands.

Question 16: How did Harvard researcher Dr. Joseph Biederman help Johnson & Johnson drug millions of children?

Biederman essentially invented pediatric bipolar disorder to create a market for J&J's Risperdal. Before his work, bipolar disorder was considered an adult illness appearing in late teens. Biederman claimed to diagnose it in two-year-olds, increasing childhood bipolar diagnoses 40-fold. J&J paid him $1.6 million while he published studies - many ghostwritten by J&J's marketing firm - promoting antipsychotics for children. He promised J&J his studies would show positive results before conducting them, violating every principle of scientific research.

When Congress investigated, they found Biederman had hidden most payments from Harvard. Yet Harvard barely punished him, and his studies remain foundational in child psychiatry. His proteges spread across the country, diagnosing millions of children with a disorder that likely doesn't exist. Children as young as 18 months were prescribed powerful antipsychotics causing obesity, diabetes, and in boys, permanent breast growth. Biederman created an entire fraudulent field of medicine that destroyed childhoods for J&J's profit. Colleagues called him "a crook" who "brought child psychiatry into disrepute."

Question 17: How did the 1982 Tylenol murders reveal Johnson & Johnson's negligence while creating false corporate mythology?

Seven Chicago residents died from cyanide-laced Extra Strength Tylenol capsules in September 1982, murders that remain unsolved. But the real scandal was J&J's negligence before and after the poisonings. The company had been warned that selling Tylenol in grocery stores without tamper-resistant packaging invited tampering, but refused because supermarkets were more profitable than pharmacies. Their distribution system was so poor they didn't know which stores had contaminated bottles, making targeted recalls impossible.

J&J initially refused recalls until public pressure forced action. Then they spent $100 million on PR to rewrite history, creating the now-famous Harvard Business School case study praising their "exemplary" crisis management. In reality, they fought against tamper-resistant packaging and used the crisis to switch from capsules to more profitable tablets. The FBI identified suspect James Lewis, but couldn't prove the case. Meanwhile, J&J's mythology from this crisis gave them a "halo effect" that protected them from scrutiny for decades of subsequent crimes.

Question 18: What is the real story behind Johnson & Johnson's Covid-19 vaccine failure?

J&J positioned itself as the noble actor in pandemic response - a single-shot, nonprofit vaccine for the world. But the reality was catastrophic mismanagement and profit-seeking. The company partnered with Emergent BioSolutions, a contractor with a history of failures, to manufacture vaccines. Emergent's Baltimore plant was filthy, with mold, peeling paint, and untrained workers. They contaminated 75 million J&J vaccine doses by mixing ingredients with AstraZeneca's vaccine. When inspectors arrived, they found 400 million doses that had to be destroyed.

J&J knew about problems but prioritized speed over safety. Their vaccine caused rare but deadly blood clots, particularly in young women, leading to its suspension. While mRNA vaccines proved 95% effective, J&J's was only 66% effective. The company had promised 100 million doses by spring 2021 but delivered only 20 million usable ones. Their failure prolonged the pandemic, causing preventable deaths. Yet CEO Alex Gorsky was celebrated at the White House, with President Biden praising J&J's "heroic" efforts while millions of contaminated doses were being destroyed.

[Unbekoming Note: This a summary of the book, not my personal thoughts. I obviously don’t agree with any of this efficacy BS. Read this to better understand my thoughts on mRNA and spike protein “efficacy.”]

Question 19: How did Johnson & Johnson corrupt medical research and academic medicine?

J&J turned medical research into marketing by capturing academic medicine. They funded entire university departments, making institutions dependent on their money. Company executives sat on medical school boards. They paid "thought leaders" at prestigious institutions to conduct studies designed to show positive results. When researchers found negative results, J&J buried the studies or threatened to cut funding. At Mount Sinai, when researchers found asbestos in Baby Powder, J&J threatened the entire institution's funding unless findings were suppressed.

The company ghostwrote medical journal articles, paying academics to pose as authors. They created fake medical journals that looked legitimate but contained only J&J propaganda. They funded over 80% of continuing medical education about their drugs, controlling what doctors learned. Medical societies became dependent on J&J funding, then issued guidelines recommending J&J products. This system corruption means most medical literature about J&J products is actually marketing material disguised as science. As one researcher said: "They didn't just buy individual doctors, they bought the entire field."

Question 20: How did Johnson & Johnson use bankruptcy law to avoid responsibility for Baby Powder cancer victims?

In 2021, facing over 60,000 lawsuits from cancer victims, J&J executed the "Texas Two-Step" - a legal maneuver to avoid paying damages. They created a subsidiary called LTL Management, transferred all Baby Powder liabilities to it, then had LTL declare bankruptcy within days. This meant cancer victims' lawsuits were frozen while J&J itself, worth $400 billion, remained financially healthy. The company offered victims a mere $8.9 billion settlement - about $148,000 per cancer case, far less than medical costs.

Courts initially allowed this scheme, with one judge praising J&J's "good faith." But appeals courts later ruled J&J couldn't use bankruptcy to avoid legitimate claims. Still, the maneuver delayed justice for years while victims died waiting for compensation. J&J simultaneously spun off its consumer division as Kenvue Inc., attempting to further distance itself from liability. This strategy showed J&J would use any legal trick to avoid accountability, treating cancer victims as financial problems to be managed rather than people they'd poisoned.

Question 21: What role did nursing homes and Omnicare play in Johnson & Johnson's illegal drugging of elderly patients?

J&J paid Omnicare, America's largest nursing home pharmacy, $280 million in kickbacks to push Risperdal and other drugs on elderly dementia patients. Omnicare controlled pharmacy services for millions of nursing home residents who had no choice in their medication. J&J created an "ElderCare" sales force specifically targeting nursing homes, where confused residents couldn't refuse drugs. Sales reps organized "ice cream socials" to pitch drugs to staff, offering illegal payments disguised as "education grants" and "data management fees."

The scheme was devastating: Risperdal doubled death risk in elderly dementia patients from strokes and heart problems. It caused severe sedation, turning active seniors into zombies. Diabetes rates skyrocketed. Falls increased from drug-induced drowsiness. Yet J&J pushed for higher doses, with one email celebrating that "dementia units are succumbing to relentless pressure." By 2003, 25% of all Risperdal prescriptions were for elderly dementia patients - all illegal since FDA had explicitly rejected this use. Nursing homes became drug-dealing operations where J&J treated helpless elderly as captive customers.

Question 22: How did the opioid epidemic reveal Johnson & Johnson as the 'kingpin' of the crisis?

While public attention focused on Purdue Pharma's OxyContin marketing, J&J operated as the shadow kingpin supplying raw materials for the entire epidemic. Through its Tasmanian subsidiary, J&J grew mutant poppies engineered for maximum opioid content, controlling 80% of the world's oxycodone and hydrocodone supply. They were "the cartel," as one prosecutor said - without J&J's poppies, there would be no pills to abuse. The company even developed "Norman" and "Noramco" subsidiaries specifically to process and distribute opioid ingredients.

But J&J went beyond supply. In the 1980s, before Purdue existed, J&J funded creation of "pain societies" that spread the foundational lie that opioids rarely cause addiction. They created the playbook Purdue later followed. With their own drug Duragesic, J&J told doctors fentanyl patches couldn't be abused while internal documents showed extensive abuse. They launched "Project Pearl" with Purdue to jointly expand opioid prescribing. An Oklahoma judge found J&J "created a public nuisance" that killed thousands, ordering $465 million in damages - later overturned on technicality while bodies piled up.

Question 23: What was the relationship between James Burke's 'ethical' leadership and Johnson & Johnson's criminal transformation?

James Burke, CEO from 1976-1989, is celebrated as history's most ethical corporate leader for his handling of the 1982 Tylenol murders. But Burke actually oversaw J&J's transformation into a criminal enterprise. He ended the company's openness with media to hide scandals. He aggressively pushed into pharmaceuticals through acquisitions and illegal marketing. Under Burke, J&J began hiding asbestos contamination, with Burke personally lying about Baby Powder safety. He created the mythological narrative around Tylenol that provided cover for future crimes.

Burke's true legacy was teaching J&J that public relations could overcome any scandal. He showed that with enough advertising and Harvard case studies, a company could be seen as ethical while acting criminally. After leaving J&J, he chaired Partnership for a Drug-Free America while J&J fueled the opioid epidemic. President Clinton awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom, cementing his false reputation. Burke proved that in American capitalism, maintaining an ethical image matters more than ethical behavior - a lesson J&J has followed ever since.

Question 24: How did clinical trials become marketing tools rather than safety studies at Johnson & Johnson?

J&J pioneered "seeding trials" - fake research studies designed solely to get doctors prescribing drugs. They would identify high-prescribing physicians, then pay them $1,000-5,000 per patient to enroll in "studies" that had no scientific value. The PIN study for Pinnacle hip implants enrolled 3,000 patients not to test safety but to get surgeons financially invested in using the device. These studies were designed by marketing departments, not scientists, with preset positive conclusions.

Real safety problems were hidden through trial manipulation. For Risperdal, when children developed breasts, J&J simply removed them from trials claiming "non-compliance." For Procrit, when cancer patients died, deaths were attributed to underlying disease, not the drug. Negative trials were never published - in one case, 22 studies showing Procrit dangers remained hidden while 6 positive studies were promoted. J&J ghostwrote study reports, controlling all data while academic "authors" never saw raw results. This corruption means most published studies about J&J products are actually advertisements disguised as science.

Question 25: What patterns of criminal behavior prove Johnson & Johnson operates like organized crime?

J&J exhibits all characteristics of organized crime: hierarchical structure where bosses order illegal acts but avoid prosecution; systematic law-breaking as standard business practice; use of front organizations to hide criminal activity; bribery of officials; witness intimidation; document destruction; and treating criminal penalties as operating costs. Like the mafia, J&J has "made men" - executives who proved themselves through successful criminal schemes get promoted. Alex Gorsky rose to CEO after overseeing illegal Risperdal marketing. Those who refuse illegal orders are fired.

The company operates protection rackets, paying doctors and hospitals for loyalty. They use "enforcers" - lawyers and PR firms - to silence critics. They launder money through "education grants" and "consulting fees" that are actually bribes. They created subsidiary companies as fronts to absorb criminal liability. From 1991-2015, J&J paid over $4 billion in criminal penalties - more than most mafia families steal in lifetimes. Yet no executive has been personally prosecuted. As one prosecutor said: "They're a criminal organization masquerading as a healthcare company."

Question 26: How has Johnson & Johnson's response to lawsuits evolved from denial to bankruptcy manipulation?

Initially, J&J used raw legal power to crush plaintiffs. They would outspend individual victims 1000:1, filing endless motions to bankrupt opponents with legal fees. They hired private investigators to dig up dirt on plaintiffs. They claimed victims were lying about injuries or had pre-existing conditions. When this stopped working due to mounting evidence, they shifted to mass settlements with gag orders, paying billions while admitting no wrongdoing and hiding evidence from future cases.

Now facing over 100,000 lawsuits, J&J pioneered using bankruptcy as a shield. They created the "Texas Two-Step" - forming subsidiary companies, transferring liability to them, then declaring bankruptcy to freeze lawsuits while J&J itself stayed solvent. They spun off consumer divisions to distance themselves from toxic products. They use legal technicalities to overturn verdicts, like arguing that federal approval shields them from state lawsuits. This evolution shows J&J treats legal consequences as logistical problems, not moral reckonings. They've never apologized to victims or admitted purposeful wrongdoing.

Question 27: What specific recommendations could prevent another Johnson & Johnson?

Doctors must be barred from taking any money from drug/device companies while treating patients - enforced by Medicare/Medicaid exclusion. The FDA needs taxpayer funding, not industry user fees that create dependence. An independent agency should monitor drug/device safety after FDA approval, like the NTSB investigates plane crashes separately from FAA. Personal criminal prosecution of executives must be mandatory for corporate crimes causing death. States should repeal laws shielding FDA-approved products from lawsuits, since FDA approval often results from industry lobbying, not safety.

Whistleblower rewards should increase to 50% of recoveries to incentivize reporting. Pharmaceutical companies should be barred from funding medical education, research, or journals. Patent extensions and exclusivity periods should be eliminated to reduce incentives for illegal marketing. Criminal penalties should be based on percentage of global revenue, not fixed amounts that become "costs of doing business." Medical schools should teach J&J's crimes as case studies in ethics failures. Finally, corporate death penalty - permanent debarment from all government programs - should apply after three criminal convictions.

Question 28: How did the transformation of American healthcare enable Johnson & Johnson's crimes?

The 1980s transformation of medicine from profession to business created the environment for J&J's crimes. Doctors became "providers" measured by productivity, not patient outcomes. Hospitals became profit centers needing corporate sponsors. Medical schools grew dependent on industry funding. Insurance companies created prior authorization systems that pushed cheaper, dangerous drugs. The patent system rewarded incremental changes over breakthrough innovation. Regulatory capture became complete when FDA started depending on industry user fees.

This system made everyone complicit. Doctors who took J&J money couldn't criticize without implicating themselves. Hospitals that received donations stayed silent about patient injuries. Medical journals dependent on J&J advertising wouldn't publish negative studies. Politicians who received campaign contributions blocked reform. Media companies earning billions from drug ads wouldn't investigate. J&J didn't corrupt a functioning system - they exploited a system designed for corruption. Until healthcare's profit motive is removed, more J&Js are inevitable.

Question 29: What does the enduring positive reputation of Johnson & Johnson reveal about American capitalism?

Despite killing millions and pleading guilty to multiple felonies, J&J remains Fortune's "most admired" pharmaceutical company. Their executives are celebrated at White House events. Harvard Business School still teaches their Tylenol response as exemplary crisis management. This reveals that American capitalism values image over reality, profits over lives, and mythology over truth. Companies can commit mass murder if they maintain good PR and keep stock prices high.

The system rewards sociopathy - executives who kill thousands get promoted while whistleblowers get destroyed. Media companies dependent on advertising won't expose crimes. Regulators seeking industry jobs won't regulate. Prosecutors accepting campaign contributions won't prosecute. J&J proves that with enough money, any crime can be transformed into a "mistake" or "settlement without admission of wrongdoing." Their enduring reputation shows American capitalism has no moral bottom - any atrocity is acceptable if quarterly earnings meet expectations.

Question 30: Why did Johnson & Johnson target babies and families from its very beginning?

From its 1886 founding, J&J understood that capturing babies meant capturing families for life. Johnson's Baby Powder created emotional bonds starting at birth - the smell, the ritual, the trust passed through generations. Parents who used J&J products on their babies became lifetime customers. This early emotional connection created unshakeable brand loyalty that survived even cancer diagnoses. Internal documents called babies "the entry point for family loyalty" and measured "lifetime customer value" starting from birth.

This targeting was insidiously brilliant because it exploited parental love and vulnerability. Parents using Baby Powder believed they were caring for their children while actually poisoning them with asbestos. The betrayal was ultimate - J&J turned parental love into a weapon against children. They knew babies' developing bodies were most vulnerable to toxins, yet specifically marketed to them. The company's foundation on exploiting maternal instincts for profit reveals its essential evil. As one victim's mother said: "I thought I was being a good mother. Instead, I was killing my daughter with powder I put on her every day."

I appreciate you being here.

If you've found the content interesting, useful and maybe even helpful, please consider supporting it through a small paid subscription. While 99% of everything here is free, your paid subscription is important as it helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. It also helps keep it free for those that cannot afford to pay.

Please make full use of the Free Libraries.

Unbekoming Interview Library: Great interviews across a spectrum of important topics.

Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Concise summaries of important books.

Stories

I'm always in search of good stories, people with valuable expertise and helpful books. Please don't hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com