Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality (2025)

newsroom

Oct 14, 2025 - 06:27

0 1

Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality (2025)

Most people believe vaccines saved humanity from deadly diseases. This belief is so fundamental to modern medicine that questioning it feels like heresy. But John Leake and Peter McCullough have done something extraordinary in their book—they’ve gone back to the actual historical data and found that the entire story is backwards. Deaths from measles, whooping cough, scarlet fever, and virtually every other infectious disease had already plummeted by 90-95% before vaccines ever arrived. The real saviors were boring: clean water, sewage systems, better nutrition, decent housing. Vaccines showed up after the battle was won and claimed victory, like a general arriving after the armistice to take credit for ending the war. This isn’t speculation or conspiracy theory—it’s what the mortality data actually shows, hidden in plain sight in government statistics that anyone can verify.

What makes this book particularly powerful is that McCullough isn’t some fringe figure—he’s one of the most published cardiologists in America, a man who stood up against medical orthodoxy during recent events and paid the professional price for it. Together with investigative author John Leake, they’ve excavated the buried history of vaccination, starting with Edward Jenner’s fraudulent cowpox experiments on his gardener’s eight-year-old son (no control group, no scientific method, just wishful thinking dressed up as discovery) and Louis Pasteur’s criminal deceptions that would make a con artist blush. Pasteur’s own laboratory notebooks, hidden for a century, revealed he stole competitors’ work, faked his data, and knew his rabies vaccine was killing children who were never at risk—yet he hid the deaths and publicized only the survivors. The foundations of vaccine science weren’t just shaky; they were built on deliberate fraud that established a pattern continuing today.

The book meticulously documents how this fraud evolved into a system. When polio cases didn’t drop fast enough after the Salk vaccine, they simply changed the definition—what required 24 hours of paralysis now needed 60 days, magically eliminating most cases overnight. The 1955 Cutter incident paralyzed 200 children and killed 10. Between 1955 and 1963, 98 million Americans received polio vaccines contaminated with SV40, a cancer-causing agent. The Leicester Method proved that sanitation alone controlled smallpox better than vaccination, achieving lower death rates than heavily vaccinated cities—so this history was erased from medical textbooks. Most damning is the autism explosion from 1 in 10,000 children in 1970 to 1 in 36 today, perfectly paralleling the vaccine schedule expansion after manufacturers got liability protection in 1986. The government knows vaccines can trigger autism—they sealed the Hannah Poling case after conceding it, and suppressed Dr. Andrew Zimmerman’s testimony that vaccines cause autism in susceptible children.

McCullough’s willingness to challenge the vaccine orthodoxy makes this book invaluable, even as he remains working within certain conventional medical frameworks that many of us have moved beyond. I’ve focused this summary entirely on the traditional childhood vaccines, setting aside the sections that venture into territories I consider less relevant. McCullough and Leake have assembled evidence that should shatter any thinking person’s trust in the vaccine program. We’ve been systematically lied to about the greatest medical fraud in history—vaccines are not safe, they’re not effective, and they’ve caused more harm than the diseases they claim to prevent. The book deserves support because McCullough’s credibility and meticulous documentation give mainstream readers permission to question what they’ve never dared question before. Sometimes the most powerful revelations come from those still partially inside the system, speaking truths that those fully outside could never get heard.

With thanks to John Leake & Dr Peter McCullough.

Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality: Leake, John, McCullough MD MPH, Peter A.

Deep Dive Conversation Library (Bonus for Paid Subscribers Only)

This deep dive is based on the book:

Discussion No.130:

Insights and reflections from “Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality”

Thank you for your support.

Analogy

The vaccine mythology is like a medieval cathedral built on a swamp. From a distance, the cathedral appears magnificent—its soaring spires reaching toward heaven, its facade adorned with promises of salvation from disease. The priests inside, dressed in white coats instead of robes, speak in Latin-like medical terminology that the common people don’t understand but deeply respect. They promise that through their sacred rituals of injection, humanity can be saved from the demons of disease that have plagued mankind since Eden.

But when you examine the foundation, you find it’s not built on solid rock of scientific truth, but on the shifting mud of manipulated statistics, suppressed data, and corporate profit. The original cornerstone—Edward Jenner’s cowpox experiment—was as fraudulent as medieval bloodletting. Each successive level was built on fraud: Pasteur’s deceptions, the diagnostic tricks that made polio appear to vanish, the hidden victims of contaminated vaccines. Like the medieval church selling indulgences, the vaccine industry sells protection from fears they themselves created, demanding payment in both money and children’s health. And just as questioning the medieval church brought charges of heresy, questioning vaccines brings modern excommunication—job loss, social ostracism, and professional destruction. The congregation continues to believe because the alternative—that they’ve been deceived by those they trusted most with their children’s lives—is too terrible to contemplate.

The One-Minute Elevator Explanation

You know how everyone believes vaccines saved us from deadly diseases? That’s backwards. Deaths from diseases like measles, whooping cough, and scarlet fever had already dropped by 95% before vaccines were invented. What really saved lives was boring stuff—clean water, flush toilets, better food, and decent housing.

Here’s what happened: vaccines showed up after diseases were already beaten, like a firefighter arriving after the rain put out the fire, then claimed credit for saving the building. The real kicker? The “father of vaccination,” Edward Jenner, tested on his gardener’s kid with no scientific method whatsoever, and Louis Pasteur—the supposed hero of vaccines—was caught faking his data when researchers examined his private notebooks a century later.

Now we’ve got 1 in 36 kids with autism compared to 1 in 10,000 in 1970, right after the vaccine schedule exploded from 8 shots to over 70. The government knows vaccines cause injuries—they’ve paid out billions in a special vaccine court you’re not supposed to know about—but vaccine makers can’t be sued thanks to a 1986 law. They have zero incentive to make vaccines safer. We eliminated diseases through sanitation and nutrition, not needles, but there’s no profit in telling people to eat better and wash their hands.

[Elevator dings]

Follow up on the Leicester Method, the Omnibus Autism Proceeding, or look into what vitamin A does for measles. The truth is hiding in plain sight.

12-Point Summary

1. The Great Deception of Disease Decline The most fundamental lie in medicine is that vaccines eliminated infectious diseases. Historical data proves that mortality from all major diseases—measles, whooping cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria—had declined by 90-95% before vaccines were introduced. This decline resulted from improved nutrition, sanitation systems, clean water, better housing, and food safety measures. Vaccines arrived at the very end of this natural decline and claimed credit for what social improvements had achieved. Diseases without vaccines, like scarlet fever and typhoid, declined at identical rates to vaccinated diseases, proving vaccines were not the critical factor. The vaccine industry has deliberately obscured this history because acknowledging it would reveal that expensive, risky medical interventions took credit for problems that society had already solved through basic public health measures.

2. The Fraudulent Foundation of Vaccination Edward Jenner, celebrated as the “father of vaccination,” built his reputation on scientific fraud that wouldn’t pass a middle school science fair today. His famous experiment on James Phipps involved one child, no control group, and no understanding of disease causation. When faced with evidence that cowpox didn’t prevent smallpox, he invented the unfalsifiable theory of “genuine” versus “spurious” cowpox, claiming failures involved the wrong kind while successes proved his theory. Louis Pasteur’s deceptions were worse—his private notebooks revealed he stole competitors’ work, faked experimental results, and tested dangerous vaccines on children without proper safety protocols. These founders of vaccination established a pattern of fraud, propaganda over science, and treating humans as guinea pigs that continues today.

3. The Diagnostic Shell Game Health authorities have repeatedly manipulated diagnostic criteria to create the illusion of vaccine success. The most blatant example occurred with polio in 1955, when diagnostic requirements changed from 24 hours of paralysis to 60 days, eliminating most cases from statistics just as the Salk vaccine was introduced. Diseases were renamed after vaccination—polio became aseptic meningitis or Guillain-Barré syndrome, allowing authorities to claim the vaccine had eliminated polio while the same paralysis continued under different names. This trick has been repeated with other diseases: changing definitions, separating syndrome components into different categories, and requiring laboratory confirmation only after vaccination. These manipulations create fake evidence of vaccine effectiveness while hiding continued disease presence.

4. The Autism Catastrophe The explosion of autism from 1 in 10,000 children in 1970 to 1 in 36 today is humanity’s greatest health catastrophe, directly paralleling vaccine schedule expansion. The increase began immediately after the 1986 law granting vaccine makers liability protection, which triggered a gold rush of new vaccines. The temporal association is undeniable—each major addition to the vaccine schedule preceded autism rate increases. The government knows vaccines trigger autism; they sealed the Hannah Poling case after conceding vaccines caused her autism, and DOJ lawyers suppressed Dr. Zimmerman’s testimony that vaccines cause autism in susceptible children. The Omnibus Autism Proceeding denied justice to 5,617 families through rigged proceedings designed to protect the vaccine program rather than discover truth.

5. The Contamination Horrors Vaccine history is littered with contamination disasters that killed and maimed thousands. The 1901 St. Louis incident killed thirteen children with tetanus-contaminated diphtheria antitoxin. The 1955 Cutter incident paralyzed 200 children and killed 10 with live polio virus in supposedly inactivated vaccines. From 1955-1963, 98 million Americans received polio vaccines contaminated with SV40, a cancer-causing monkey virus that integrated into human DNA and can be passed to future generations. These aren’t isolated incidents but a pattern showing that injecting biological products cultured in animal cells or other living systems carries unpredictable risks that don’t manifest for decades. Each disaster is forgotten, allowing the next one to occur.

6. The Liability Protection Racket The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a moral hazard by removing manufacturer liability for vaccine injuries. Pharmaceutical companies now profit from mandatory vaccine programs while taxpayers compensate victims through a rigged vaccine court. This court operates under special rules making compensation impossible: shortened statutes of limitations, caps on damages, no jury trials, no discovery process. Since manufacturers face no consequences for injuries, they have no incentive to improve safety. The vaccine schedule exploded after liability protection, going from 8 vaccines to over 70 doses. Companies openly acknowledge vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” while using this designation to maintain protection from lawsuits.

7. The Suppression Machine A coordinated system destroys anyone who questions vaccine safety. Dr. Andrew Wakefield was professionally annihilated for suggesting research into MMR vaccine and autism, despite never claiming causation. Scientists who find safety problems lose funding and careers. Doctors who report vaccine injuries face medical board investigations. Parents of vaccine-injured children are gaslit, told injuries are coincidental, and labeled “anti-vaxxers” if they speak out. Medical journals refuse to publish safety studies while publishing ghost-written pharmaceutical propaganda. Media outlets dependent on pharma advertising refuse to cover vaccine injuries. This is systematic suppression of evidence that threatens a profitable industry.

8. The Natural Immunity Destruction Vaccination has disrupted humanity’s co-evolved relationship with childhood diseases, replacing superior natural immunity with inferior artificial immunity. Natural measles infection provides lifelong immunity, protects infants through maternal antibodies, and prevents certain cancers and autoimmune diseases. The vaccine provides temporary immunity requiring endless boosters, leaves infants vulnerable, and has shifted disease to more dangerous age groups. Mass vaccination has created an immunological disaster—populations of adults with waning immunity, infants without maternal protection, and the loss of natural boosting from circulating wild virus. We’ve traded manageable childhood diseases for lifelong pharmaceutical dependency.

9. The Hidden Alternative Success The Leicester Method proved that sanitation, isolation, and quarantine controlled smallpox better than vaccination, achieving lower mortality rates than heavily vaccinated cities. This success story has been erased from medical history because it proves vaccines aren’t necessary. Similar suppressions occurred with nutritional interventions—vitamin A supplementation reduces measles mortality by 90%, eliminating risk in well-nourished children, but this cheap solution is ignored in favor of profitable vaccines. Every successful non-vaccine intervention, from improved hygiene to immune-supporting nutrition, is marginalized or ridiculed to maintain the vaccine monopoly on disease prevention.

10. The Fear Factory The vaccine industry manufactures terror to drive compliance, portraying mild childhood diseases as death sentences. Measles, which had a 0.01% mortality rate in well-nourished children, is presented as if it were the black plague. Parents are bombarded with images of iron lungs and dying children, never told these outcomes were rare and primarily affected malnourished or immunocompromised individuals. Fear campaigns are synchronized across media, medicine, and government, creating hysteria that overwhelms rational risk assessment. This psychological manipulation exploits parental protective instincts, making them accept vaccine risks they would never tolerate if thinking clearly about actual disease risks versus vaccine injuries.

11. The Safety Illusion The vaccine safety monitoring system is designed to hide injuries, not detect them. The Harvard Pilgrim study found that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS, meaning actual injuries are 100 times higher than official figures. Doctors are discouraged from reporting, parents are gaslit about obvious vaccine reactions, and the CDC abandoned the Harvard electronic reporting system that would capture more injuries. Clinical trials use other vaccines as “placebos” rather than saline, hiding adverse effects. Long-term safety studies are never conducted. The cumulative effect of multiple vaccines is never tested. This is orchestrated concealment of a public health disaster.

12. The Perpetual Profit Machine The vaccine industry has created a perfect business model: mandatory consumption of products with no liability for harm, expanding markets through ever-growing schedules, and endless boosters for waning immunity. Pharmaceutical companies fund medical schools, control medical journals, capture regulatory agencies, and buy political influence to maintain this system. They’ve transformed public health from preventing disease through social improvements into forcing medical interventions that generate guaranteed profits. Each vaccine added to the schedule creates billions in revenue with no risk to manufacturers. The system is designed to expand perpetually—new vaccines for minor diseases, earlier ages, more boosters, adult mandates. It’s not about health but about creating lifelong pharmaceutical customers from birth, extracting maximum profit regardless of harm caused.

The Golden Nugget

The most profound revelation in vaccine history that virtually no one knows is that Louis Pasteur’s rabies vaccine killed more people than it saved, and Pasteur knew it. His private laboratory notebooks, kept secret for a century and finally examined by Princeton historian Gerald Geison, revealed that Pasteur had observed his rabies vaccine causing paralysis and death in test animals—the same symptoms seen in his human patients. Since only about 15% of people bitten by rabid animals actually develop rabies, and many of the animals that bit Pasteur’s patients were never confirmed rabid, most of his “patients” were never at risk. Yet he injected them with increasingly virulent rabies material that could itself cause the disease. When patients developed paralysis after his treatment, he claimed they must have had rabies already, but his notebooks show he knew his vaccine was killing them. The most damning evidence: Pasteur kept secret the cases where his treatment failed, only publicizing successes. This means the founding hero of vaccination was murdering children with unnecessary treatment while knowing it, hiding the deaths, and building his fame on the survivors who were never at risk in the first place. The entire foundation of vaccine science was built on a lie so dark that even today, with the evidence available, the medical establishment refuses to acknowledge it—because doing so would collapse the mythology that sustains their multi-billion dollar industry.

30 Questions and Answers

Question 1: What is the central myth about vaccines and infectious disease mortality in the 20th century, and what were the actual causes of disease decline?

The central myth is that vaccines were primarily responsible for the dramatic reduction in infectious disease mortality during the 20th century. This belief has become so entrenched that the American Academy of Pediatrics used it as a key argument in the 2010 Bruesewitz v. Wyeth case, claiming vaccines were instrumental in eliminating disease deaths. However, historical data reveals a strikingly different story. Between 1900 and 1950, before most vaccines were even introduced, deaths from infectious diseases had already declined by approximately 74 percent. Measles mortality had fallen by over 95 percent before the vaccine was introduced in 1963, and similar patterns occurred with other diseases.

The actual causes of this remarkable decline were improvements in nutrition, sanitation, clean water supplies, better housing conditions, and food safety measures. Child mortality dropped from about 30 percent in 1800 to less than 1 percent by 1950, primarily due to these environmental and social improvements. The development of municipal water treatment, sewage systems, pasteurization of milk, and better nutrition eliminated the conditions that allowed diseases to thrive. Vaccines arrived late in this process, finishing off disease burdens that had already been drastically reduced by other factors. This myth persists because it serves powerful interests and provides a simple narrative that positions medical intervention as humanity’s savior from disease.

Question 2: How did Cotton Mather’s religious beliefs influence the first inoculation campaign in Boston in 1721, and what parallels exist with modern vaccine advocacy?

Cotton Mather, the Puritan minister who championed Boston’s first inoculation campaign during the 1721 smallpox outbreak, approached vaccination with religious fervor rather than scientific rigor. As co-pastor of the Old North Meeting House and a key figure in the Salem Witch Trials, Mather believed in both the supernatural and natural worlds. When he learned about variolation from his enslaved man Onesimus and confirmed it through Royal Society publications, he saw it as God’s providence—a divine remedy delivered through human hands. Despite fierce opposition from the medical establishment and much of Boston’s population, Mather promoted inoculation as a moral imperative, combining his religious authority with selective interpretation of results.

The parallels with modern vaccine advocacy are striking. Just as Mather relied on faith and fervor rather than controlled studies, today’s vaccine proponents display religious devotion to vaccination that transcends scientific evidence. The tendency to cherry-pick favorable data while ignoring failures, the moral righteousness attached to vaccination, and the vilification of skeptics all echo Mather’s approach. Like the Salem Witch Trials where “spectral evidence” was accepted, modern vaccine science accepts correlation as causation when it supports vaccination, while dismissing it when it suggests harm. The pattern of using fear of disease to override rational risk assessment, and positioning vaccination as a moral duty rather than a medical choice requiring informed consent, remains unchanged from Mather’s time.

Question 3: What are the problems with Edward Jenner’s original cowpox experiment on James Phipps, and how did he manipulate his theory when faced with contradictory evidence?

Edward Jenner’s famous 1796 experiment on eight-year-old James Phipps, the son of his gardener, violated basic scientific and ethical principles that make his conclusions invalid. Jenner took pus from cowpox lesions on dairymaid Sarah Nelmes’s hand and inserted it into cuts on the boy’s arm. After the boy recovered from the resulting illness, Jenner repeatedly challenged him with smallpox material, declaring victory when the boy didn’t develop smallpox. However, this single case proved nothing—the boy was either naturally immune or the smallpox material was inactive. Jenner had no control group, no understanding of what caused either disease, and based his entire theory on one child who couldn’t refuse participation.

When faced with numerous documented cases of people who contracted cowpox but still got smallpox—evidence that directly contradicted his theory—Jenner invented an elaborate explanation rather than admitting error. He claimed there were two types of cowpox: “genuine” cowpox that came from a horse disease called “the grease,” and “spurious” cowpox that occurred spontaneously in cows. Only the genuine type, he insisted, provided protection. This conveniently unfalsifiable theory allowed him to dismiss any failure as “spurious cowpox” while claiming any success validated his method. When physician William Woodville found cowpox outbreaks with no connection to horses, Jenner simply adjusted his story. This pattern of retrofitting theories to maintain a predetermined conclusion, rather than following evidence wherever it leads, established a template for vaccine science that persists today.

Question 4: How did Jenner explain away the documented cases of people who got cowpox but still contracted smallpox, and what was his “genuine vs spurious cowpox” theory?

Jenner’s “genuine versus spurious cowpox” theory was a masterpiece of circular reasoning designed to maintain his claims despite contradictory evidence. When multiple country doctors reported cases of dairymaids who had contracted cowpox but later developed smallpox, Jenner faced a crisis that threatened his entire theory. Rather than acknowledge these failures, he created an unfalsifiable explanation: there were two kinds of cowpox, and only the “genuine” type that originated from horse grease provided protection against smallpox. Any case where cowpox failed to protect was retroactively classified as “spurious,” while any success confirmed the presence of “genuine” cowpox.

This intellectual sleight of hand meant Jenner could never be proven wrong. Charles Creighton, a contemporary critic, observed that Jenner “kept silence about the cases of cowpoxed milkers subsequently smallpoxed, which he might easily have collected in considerable numbers from the experience of his own district.” Instead, Jenner confined his attention only to cases that seemed to support his theory. When challenged, he would simply declare that failures must have involved the wrong kind of cowpox, without providing any reliable way to distinguish between the two types before vaccination. This same pattern—explaining away failures through post-hoc redefinitions while claiming successes prove the theory—has become a recurring feature in vaccine science, where adverse events are dismissed as “coincidences” while any positive outcome is attributed to vaccination.

Question 5: What was the Leicester Method, and how did it successfully control smallpox without vaccination in the late 1800s?

The Leicester Method represented a revolutionary approach to disease control that challenged the vaccination orthodoxy of Victorian England. After experiencing vaccine failures and witnessing vaccinated people dying from smallpox during the 1871-73 epidemic, the city of Leicester developed a comprehensive public health strategy that relied on sanitation, isolation of cases, and quarantine of contacts rather than mass vaccination. The system included immediate notification of cases, prompt removal of patients to isolation hospitals, thorough disinfection of homes and belongings, and careful monitoring of all contacts. The city abandoned infant vaccination despite England’s mandatory vaccination laws, with vaccination rates dropping to just 3-7% of infants by the 1890s.

The results shocked the medical establishment. Leicester experienced lower smallpox mortality rates than heavily vaccinated cities. During the 1892-94 smallpox outbreak, Leicester had only 19.3 deaths per 100,000 population compared to 43.3 in well-vaccinated Birmingham and 29.5 in London. The method proved so successful that C. Killick Millard, Leicester’s Medical Officer of Health, became a prominent advocate for ending compulsory vaccination. The Leicester Method demonstrated that improved sanitation, nutrition, and targeted public health measures controlled smallpox more effectively than vaccination. This real-world experiment, conducted over decades with a population of hundreds of thousands, provided powerful evidence that the medical establishment’s faith in vaccination was misplaced. This history has been deliberately erased from medical education because it fundamentally challenges the vaccine paradigm.

Question 6: How did the 1871-73 smallpox epidemic in the UK challenge the narrative about vaccine effectiveness, given that most of the population was vaccinated?

The 1871-73 smallpox epidemic in the United Kingdom delivered a devastating blow to vaccine theory that authorities have been trying to explain away ever since. This epidemic occurred after decades of compulsory vaccination laws, with the vast majority of the population vaccinated. Official statistics showed that 97.5% of people had been vaccinated, yet England and Wales experienced 44,000 deaths from smallpox—one of the worst epidemics in the nation’s history. In Birmingham, Dr. Henry May documented that of 1,000 smallpox cases in his hospital, 71% had been vaccinated, proving that vaccination provided little protection against the disease.

The medical establishment’s response to this catastrophic failure revealed the deep commitment to vaccination regardless of evidence. Rather than questioning the efficacy of vaccination, authorities blamed the epidemic on the small percentage of unvaccinated people, claimed the vaccines must have been improperly stored or administered, or argued that people needed more frequent revaccination. Some suggested that the epidemic would have been worse without vaccination—an unfalsifiable claim that became a standard defense. The epidemic led directly to the formation of the Anti-Compulsory Vaccination movement and the development of the Leicester Method. This historical event demonstrates how vaccine faith persists despite contradictory evidence, with authorities always finding ways to explain away failures rather than admitting that vaccination was not the miracle intervention they claimed.

Question 7: What deceptions did Louis Pasteur commit in his anthrax vaccine demonstrations at Pouilly-le-Fort, and what did his private notebooks reveal?

Louis Pasteur’s famous anthrax vaccine demonstration at Pouilly-le-Fort in 1881, long celebrated as a triumph of scientific method, was built on deliberate deception. Pasteur publicly claimed to use his own oxygen-attenuated vaccine method, but his laboratory notebooks, examined by historian Gerald Geison a century later, revealed he actually used his rival Jean Joseph Henri Toussaint’s potassium dichromate method. When challenged to prove his vaccine’s effectiveness, Pasteur knew his own method was unreliable, so he secretly used Toussaint’s approach while taking full credit for the success. The demonstration involved vaccinating 25 sheep, leaving 25 unvaccinated, then exposing all to anthrax. The vaccinated sheep survived while the unvaccinated died, creating a public sensation that established Pasteur’s reputation.

The notebooks exposed other troubling patterns in Pasteur’s work. He routinely announced discoveries before completing experiments, manipulated data to support predetermined conclusions, and took credit for others’ work. His assistant Émile Roux, who actually prepared the vaccine used at Pouilly-le-Fort, later revealed the deception, creating a rift between them. Pasteur’s nephew, Adrien Loir, admitted that Pasteur would present only nine successful results if one out of ten experiments failed. This wasn’t mere competitive behavior—it was systematic scientific fraud that established vaccination on false pretenses. The fact that Pasteur achieved fame and fortune through deception, while his rival Toussaint was marginalized, demonstrates how personality, politics, and propaganda matter more than scientific truth in establishing medical orthodoxy.

Question 8: How did Pasteur violate medical ethics with his rabies vaccine, particularly in the case of Joseph Meister?

Pasteur’s treatment of nine-year-old Joseph Meister in 1885, celebrated as the first successful rabies vaccination, violated fundamental principles of medical ethics and scientific methodology. Pasteur, who had no medical degree and no legal right to treat patients, had tested his rabies vaccine on only a few dogs before jumping to human experimentation. When Meister was brought to him after being bitten by a supposedly rabid dog, Pasteur began an experimental treatment without any evidence the boy would develop rabies—a disease that manifests in only about 15% of people bitten by rabid animals. The dog that bit Meister was killed immediately, so it couldn’t be observed for rabies symptoms. Pasteur used a child as a guinea pig for an unproven treatment that could cause the disease it claimed to prevent.

Pasteur’s own notebooks reveal he was uncertain about the vaccine’s safety and had observed troubling reactions in animals. He proceeded anyway, driven by ambition rather than scientific caution. The treatment involved 13 increasingly virulent injections over 10 days, each capable of causing rabies. When Meister survived, Pasteur proclaimed victory, but this proved nothing—the boy would have survived without any treatment since he was never at risk. More disturbing, Pasteur kept secret the cases where his treatment failed, including patients who developed paralysis after his injections. His colleague Émile Roux was so disturbed by Pasteur’s recklessness that he initially refused to participate. This pattern of experimenting on vulnerable people, hiding failures, and proclaiming success based on cherry-picked cases established a template that continues in vaccine development today.

Question 9: What actually happened in the 1901 St. Louis incident with diphtheria antitoxin that killed multiple children?

The 1901 St. Louis tragedy stands as one of the earliest documented mass vaccine disasters in American history, revealing the dangers of rushing biological products to market without adequate safety measures. The city’s health department was producing diphtheria antitoxin using a horse named Jim, who had been used for years to generate the serum. Unknown to the producers, Jim had contracted tetanus. The contaminated serum drawn from Jim in September 1901 was distributed throughout the city without proper testing. Within weeks, thirteen children who received the antitoxin developed tetanus and died agonizing deaths, including five-year-old Veronica Newell, whose case became emblematic of the tragedy.

The investigation revealed systemic failures at every level—no testing protocols, no tracking system for batches, and no quality control measures. The horse had been destroyed after showing signs of illness, but the contaminated serum had already been distributed. This disaster led directly to the passage of the Biologics Control Act of 1902, the first federal regulation of biological products. The pattern it revealed—authorities rushing inadequately tested biological products to market, children dying from contamination, and regulations being enacted only after tragedy strikes—has repeated throughout vaccine history. The St. Louis incident demonstrated that the production of biological medical products carried unique risks that standard drug manufacturing didn’t face, yet these lessons were forgotten repeatedly in subsequent decades, leading to similar tragedies with contaminated polio vaccines and other biological products.

Question 10: How did diagnostic criteria for polio change in 1955, and what impact did this have on making the vaccine appear effective?

The diagnostic criteria for polio underwent a dramatic change in 1955, the same year the Salk vaccine was introduced, creating an illusion of vaccine effectiveness through statistical manipulation. Before 1955, any patient presenting with paralytic symptoms for only 24 hours would be diagnosed as having polio. After 1955, the criteria required paralytic symptoms to persist for at least 60 days for a polio diagnosis. Since most people who experienced paralysis from polio recovered within 60 days, this change alone eliminated the vast majority of cases from the statistics, making it appear the vaccine was preventing disease when the definition had simply been narrowed.

Additional diagnostic changes further skewed the numbers. Before the vaccine, many diseases including Coxsackie virus infections, aseptic meningitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and even some cases of lead poisoning were misdiagnosed as polio. After 1955, with the introduction of laboratory testing and more stringent diagnostic criteria, these conditions were correctly identified and separated from polio statistics. Dr. Bernard Greenberg, head of the Department of Biostatistics at the University of North Carolina, testified that these diagnostic changes predetermined a decrease in polio cases regardless of vaccination. He stated that simply by changing diagnostic criteria, “the number of paralytic cases was predetermined to decrease in 1955-1957, whether or not any vaccine was used.” This manipulation of diagnostic criteria to create the appearance of vaccine success became a template used repeatedly, including renaming conditions, reclassifying diseases, and changing reporting requirements whenever vaccines appear to fail.

Question 11: What evidence suggests Franklin Roosevelt had Guillain-Barré syndrome rather than polio, and why does this distinction matter?

Medical researchers examining Franklin Roosevelt’s medical records have concluded he suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome, not polio, when he became paralyzed in 1921 at age 39. Roosevelt’s age alone makes polio implausible—the disease was called “infantile paralysis” because it primarily affected children under five. His symptoms aligned with Guillain-Barré: symmetric ascending paralysis, facial paralysis, bladder and bowel dysfunction, and severe pain. Polio typically causes asymmetric paralysis and rarely affects facial muscles or causes the prolonged pain Roosevelt experienced. His fever pattern and the progression of symptoms over two weeks matched Guillain-Barré, while polio paralysis typically occurs at the fever’s peak and develops within days.

This misdiagnosis matters profoundly because Roosevelt became the face of polio, founding the March of Dimes and driving the national obsession with developing a polio vaccine. His celebrity status and political power transformed polio from one of many childhood diseases into a national terror, generating massive funding for vaccine development. The most famous polio patient didn’t have polio—this highlights how fear and misinformation, rather than scientific accuracy, drove the vaccine campaign. The misdiagnosis also demonstrates how primitive diagnostic capabilities were even into the 1950s—if doctors couldn’t correctly diagnose the President of the United States, the accuracy of ordinary citizens’ diagnoses was equally questionable. This diagnostic uncertainty undermines claims about polio’s prevalence and the vaccine’s effectiveness, as many conditions were mislabeled as polio before laboratory testing became available.

Question 12: What was the Cutter incident, and how many children were paralyzed or killed by contaminated polio vaccines?

The Cutter incident of 1955 stands as one of the worst pharmaceutical disasters in American history, occurring just weeks after the Salk polio vaccine was licensed. Cutter Laboratories in Berkeley, California, failed to properly inactivate the poliovirus in their vaccine lots, releasing vaccines containing live, virulent virus. Within days of the mass vaccination campaign’s launch, children began developing paralysis. The contaminated vaccine caused 40,000 cases of polio, leaving 200 children with varying degrees of paralysis and killing 10. The virus shed from these victims sparked polio outbreaks in their communities, causing 113 additional cases of paralysis and 5 more deaths among family and community contacts.

The incident revealed fundamental flaws in the vaccine production and oversight process. The government had licensed the vaccine based on Salk’s small field trials without understanding the complexities of mass production. Cutter had followed Salk’s written protocols, but these protocols were inadequate for ensuring complete virus inactivation at industrial scale. Other manufacturers also had problems with live virus in their vaccines, though none as catastrophic as Cutter’s. The government’s response was telling—rather than questioning the rush to mass vaccination, officials blamed Cutter alone, maintaining public faith in the vaccination program while quietly implementing new safety protocols. The incident demonstrated that scaling up vaccine production from laboratory to industrial levels introduced deadly variables, yet this lesson has been repeatedly ignored in subsequent vaccine campaigns.

Question 13: How did the SV40 cancer virus contaminate millions of polio vaccine doses, and what were the implications?

Between 1955 and 1963, 98 million Americans received polio vaccines contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV40), a cancer-causing monkey virus. The contamination occurred because the vaccine was produced using monkey kidney cells, and the methods used to inactivate poliovirus didn’t destroy SV40. Scientists discovered this contamination in 1960, but rather than immediately withdrawing contaminated stocks, authorities allowed existing supplies to be used through 1963. Both the Salk injectable and Sabin oral vaccines were affected. SV40 caused cancers in laboratory animals and transformed human cells into cancer cells in vitro. The virus integrated into human DNA and could be passed to offspring, meaning the contamination affected multiple generations.

The long-term implications remain actively suppressed and unstudied due to institutional resistance to investigating vaccine-caused harm. Researchers found SV40 DNA in human brain tumors, bone cancers, and mesotheliomas decades after the contamination, proving the link between contaminated vaccines and cancer development. The Institute of Medicine concluded that evidence was “inadequate to accept or reject” a causal relationship between SV40-contaminated vaccines and cancer—a deliberate non-conclusion that avoided liability while acknowledging concern. This incident demonstrated that vaccines introduce unknown pathogens with consequences that don’t appear for decades. It proved that authorities prioritize maintaining public confidence in vaccination over public safety, allowing contaminated vaccines to be used rather than risk undermining the vaccine program. The SV40 contamination remains a stark warning about the long-term risks of injecting biological products derived from animals or cultured cells into millions of people.

Question 14: What injuries were caused by the whole-cell pertussis vaccine that led Japan to develop an acellular version?

The whole-cell pertussis vaccine, part of the DTP shot, caused such severe injuries that multiple countries witnessed public revolts against it. The vaccine contained entire killed bacteria with endotoxins that caused high fevers, persistent screaming, seizures, and permanent brain damage. Studies documented encephalopathy (brain inflammation) occurring at rates of 1 in 100,000 to 1 in 300,000 doses. Children suffered permanent neurological damage, including intellectual disability, paralysis, and chronic seizures. The vaccine caused sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in documented cases, though authorities consistently denied the connection. By the 1970s, the evidence of harm was undeniable, with thousands of children left permanently disabled.

Japan experienced massive public protests after two infants died within 24 hours of DTP vaccination in 1974. The Japanese government suspended the vaccine program, then raised the minimum age for vaccination from 3 months to 2 years, dramatically reducing severe adverse events. Japanese scientists, led by Yuji Sato, developed an acellular pertussis vaccine using only specific proteins rather than whole bacteria. This safer vaccine, introduced in 1981, caused far fewer adverse reactions while maintaining effectiveness. Sweden and the UK also saw vaccination rates plummet due to safety concerns. The United States continued using the dangerous whole-cell vaccine until the 1990s, two decades after Japan proved a safer alternative existed. This delay, during which thousands more American children were unnecessarily injured, occurred because manufacturers had invested in whole-cell vaccine production and enjoyed liability protection. The pertussis vaccine history proves that safer vaccines are possible when public pressure demands them, but manufacturers have no incentive to improve safety when they’re protected from lawsuits.

Question 15: What did Dr. Andrew Wakefield actually say in his 1998 Lancet paper, and how was it misrepresented?

Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 Lancet paper has been so thoroughly misrepresented that few people know what it actually said. The paper was a case series of twelve children who developed intestinal problems and regressive autism. Eight parents reported their children’s behavioral symptoms began shortly after MMR vaccination. Wakefield and twelve co-authors simply reported these observations and found a novel form of bowel disease in these children. The paper explicitly stated: “We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described.” It was a preliminary observation calling for further research, not a definitive claim that MMR caused autism. Wakefield suggested it would be prudent to use single vaccines rather than the combined MMR while more research was conducted—a reasonable precautionary recommendation.

The paper was transformed through propaganda into something it never claimed to be. Media and medical establishments falsely portrayed it as an anti-vaccine manifesto claiming definitive proof that MMR caused autism. Wakefield never said vaccines shouldn’t be given, never claimed to have proven causation, and never told parents to avoid vaccination. He reported clinical observations and called for more research—exactly what medical science is supposed to do. The hysteria around the paper wasn’t about its actual contents but about the threat it posed to the vaccine program. Even suggesting a possible link between vaccines and autism, or recommending spacing out vaccines as a precaution, was treated as heresy. The campaign to destroy Wakefield was designed to send a message: any doctor who questions vaccine safety, regardless of how reasonable their concerns or preliminary their findings, will be professionally destroyed.

Question 16: How did Brian Deer and the pharmaceutical industry orchestrate the destruction of Andrew Wakefield’s career and reputation?

Brian Deer, a freelance journalist with no medical training, became the pharmaceutical industry’s weapon to destroy Andrew Wakefield. Deer’s attacks began in 2004, timed precisely before the U.S. Omnibus Autism Proceeding where thousands of families would claim vaccine injury. Working for Rupert Murdoch’s Sunday Times, Deer made allegations about undisclosed financial conflicts of interest, though Wakefield’s legal work was already known to his co-authors and the Lancet. Deer attended the vaccine court proceedings for five years, admitting he served as an informant for the U.S. government—a legally questionable role for a foreign journalist. His articles consistently appeared at crucial moments to influence legal proceedings or public opinion, proving coordination rather than independent journalism.

The campaign involved multiple institutions working in concert. The General Medical Council (GMC) held the longest disciplinary hearing in its history, spending millions to prosecute Wakefield while denying him comparable resources for defense. The GMC panel included members with undisclosed vaccine industry ties. The Lancet retracted the paper in 2010, citing the GMC findings rather than any scientific invalidity. Media outlets universally promoted Deer’s narrative while denying Wakefield platforms to respond. Medical journals refused to publish research supporting Wakefield’s findings. This wasn’t scientific debate but character assassination designed to destroy not just Wakefield but anyone who might follow his path. The message was clear: question vaccines and we’ll destroy your career, reputation, and livelihood. The success of this campaign created a chilling effect that persists today, with doctors afraid to report vaccine adverse events or investigate vaccine-autism connections for fear of similar treatment.

Question 17: What is the relationship between vitamin A deficiency and measles mortality, and how does this change the vaccination discussion?

The relationship between vitamin A deficiency and measles mortality fundamentally undermines the vaccine narrative. Studies definitively show that vitamin A deficiency is the primary determinant of measles severity and death. Children with adequate vitamin A levels experience measles as a mild illness with zero mortality, while vitamin A-deficient children face severe complications and death. A 1990 study in Cape Town showed that vitamin A supplementation reduced measles mortality by 90%. The WHO now recommends vitamin A supplementation for all children with measles, acknowledging that nutrition, not vaccination, is the key to preventing measles deaths. Historical data shows measles mortality had declined by over 95% before the vaccine was introduced, primarily due to improved nutrition.

This changes the entire vaccination discussion because it reveals that measles danger is a function of poverty and malnutrition, not an inherent property of the virus. Instead of mass vaccination programs with their associated risks, ensuring adequate nutrition eliminates measles mortality. Natural measles infection provides lifelong immunity and primes the immune system in ways that vaccination cannot replicate. Studies show childhood measles infection protects against certain cancers and allergic diseases later in life. The vaccine provides temporary immunity requiring boosters, has shifted measles infection to more dangerous age groups (infants and adults), and carries its own risks. The vitamin A connection exposes how vaccine promoters exploit preventable malnutrition in developing countries to create fear and justify mandatory vaccination in well-nourished populations where measles poses no risk. It’s a profound example of addressing the wrong problem—vaccinating against a disease instead of correcting the nutritional deficiency that makes it dangerous.

Question 18: How has autism prevalence changed from 1970 to 2023, and what does the timeline suggest about potential causes?

The explosion in autism prevalence from 1 in 10,000 children in 1970 to 1 in 36 children in 2023 is humanity’s greatest health catastrophe, directly paralleling vaccine schedule expansion. This timeline proves causation. In 1970, children received about 8 vaccines. By 2023, children receive over 70 doses of vaccines by age 18, with multiple vaccines given simultaneously. The steepest increases in autism rates occurred in the 1990s, immediately following the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act that gave manufacturers liability protection and led to a proliferation of new vaccines. The introduction of the MMR vaccine in 1988, the addition of Hib vaccines in 1990, and Hepatitis B vaccination of newborns in 1991 all preceded dramatic increases in autism diagnoses.

Authorities claim this increase represents better diagnosis and broader diagnostic criteria, but this explanation cannot account for the magnitude of change. Teachers, therapists, and pediatricians confirm they’re seeing unprecedented numbers of severely affected children who would never have been missed in previous decades. The idea that we failed to notice 1 in 36 children with significant neurological impairment in the past is absurd. Genetics cannot explain such rapid change in two generations. Environmental toxins are involved, but the temporal association with vaccine schedule expansion is too precise to ignore. Amish communities with low vaccination rates have virtually no autism, while heavily vaccinated populations show rates continuing to climb. The timeline reveals that each expansion of the vaccine schedule has been followed by increased autism rates, proving causation that would trigger immediate investigation in any other context but is forbidden territory when vaccines are involved.

Question 19: What happened in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding, and why were 5,617 families denied justice?

The Omnibus Autism Proceeding (OAP) was a coordinated judicial strategy to prevent thousands of vaccine-injured families from obtaining compensation. Beginning in 2002, 5,617 families filed claims in vaccine court alleging their children developed autism from vaccines. Rather than hearing each case individually, which would have revealed the pattern of injury, the court consolidated them into a single proceeding using just six test cases. The selection of test cases was manipulated to focus on narrow, difficult-to-prove theories like thimerosal-only causation or MMR-only causation, rather than the plausible theory that multiple vaccines given simultaneously trigger neurological injury in susceptible children. This strategic narrowing doomed the cases from the start.

The proceeding was rigged through multiple mechanisms. The government had unlimited resources while families had limited legal aid. Government expert witnesses were paid handsomely while families’ experts were intimidated and discredited. Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, the government’s star witness, later revealed in an affidavit that he told DOJ lawyers that vaccines cause autism in certain children, but they suppressed his testimony and continued using his earlier statements out of context. The special masters ignored compelling evidence, applied impossibly high standards of proof, and dismissed the temporal associations reported by thousands of parents as coincidence. The court decided all 5,617 cases based on just six test cases, denying families their right to individual hearings. This mass dismissal protected the vaccine industry from billions in liability while sending a message that vaccine injury claims, regardless of how numerous or credible, would not be fairly heard. The proceeding revealed that vaccine court exists not to compensate injuries but to protect the vaccine program.

Question 20: What did Dr. Andrew Zimmerman testify about vaccines and autism, and how was his testimony suppressed by the Department of Justice?

Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, one of the world’s leading pediatric neurologists and a former expert witness for the government, provided explosive testimony that the Department of Justice deliberately suppressed. In 2007, while serving as the government’s expert witness in vaccine court, Zimmerman told DOJ lawyers that vaccines trigger autism in a subset of children with mitochondrial dysfunction. He specifically stated that he had seen cases where children with underlying mitochondrial disorders developed regressive autism following vaccination. This directly contradicted the government’s blanket denial that vaccines could cause autism. Zimmerman explained that in susceptible children, the immune activation and fever from vaccines stress their mitochondrial function, leading to neurological regression.

The DOJ’s response revealed the depth of corruption in vaccine court. Rather than presenting Zimmerman’s complete opinion, government lawyers fired him as an expert witness and continued using his earlier written statement out of context, making it appear he universally denied any vaccine-autism link. They deliberately misrepresented his position in subsequent cases while preventing him from clarifying his views. Years later, Zimmerman provided a sworn affidavit exposing this deception, stating that DOJ lawyers “misrepresented the truth” and that vaccines cause autism in genetically susceptible children. His testimony should have changed the outcome for thousands of families in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding, but it was suppressed to protect the vaccine program. This is deliberate suppression of evidence that vaccines trigger autism, perpetrated by government lawyers supposedly seeking truth in vaccine court.

Question 21: What was significant about the Hannah Poling case, and why was the government’s concession sealed?

The Hannah Poling case represents the government’s sealed admission that vaccines cause autism. Hannah was a healthy 19-month-old who received five vaccines for nine diseases in one visit. Within 48 hours, she developed a high fever, became lethargic, and began losing language skills. She was eventually diagnosed with regressive autism and mitochondrial disorder. Her father, Dr. Jon Poling, a Johns Hopkins neurologist, and her mother, Terry, a nurse and lawyer, filed a claim in vaccine court. The case was originally part of the Omnibus Autism Proceeding test cases, positioned to represent thousands of similar claims. Then something unprecedented happened—the government suddenly conceded the case and removed it from the OAP, agreeing to pay compensation.

The government’s frantic effort to seal and minimize this concession revealed its explosive nature. Officials claimed they were compensating Hannah for a “table injury” of encephalopathy, not autism, though encephalopathy was simply the mechanism by which vaccines triggered her autism. They insisted Hannah’s case was unique due to her mitochondrial disorder, but never tested other autistic children to see how many shared this condition. The case was sealed, preventing other families from using it as precedent. When details leaked to the media, CDC officials held emergency press conferences insisting this case meant nothing for other children. Dr. Paul Offit wrote editorials attacking the Polings for speaking publicly about their daughter’s injury. If Hannah’s case was unique, there would be no reason to desperately fight to keep it secret. Hannah’s case proved vaccines cause autism in susceptible children, and the government knew countless other children suffered the same injury.

Question 22: How does the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 protect manufacturers, and what impact has this had on vaccine safety?

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 granted vaccine manufacturers complete immunity from civil lawsuits, fundamentally corrupting the incentive structure for vaccine safety. Before 1986, manufacturers faced liability for injuries their products caused, creating a natural incentive to ensure safety. After numerous DTP vaccine injury lawsuits threatened their profits, manufacturers threatened to stop producing vaccines unless granted liability protection. Rather than demanding safer vaccines, Congress capitulated, creating a special vaccine court where injured parties must sue the government rather than manufacturers. This court operates under special rules that make compensation impossible: shortened statutes of limitations, caps on damages, no jury trials, no discovery process, and special masters rather than judges.

The impact on vaccine safety has been catastrophic. With liability protection secured, manufacturers have no incentive to improve existing vaccines or ensure new ones are safe. The vaccine schedule exploded from about 8 vaccines in 1986 to over 70 doses today. New vaccines are approved with minimal safety testing—days or weeks of monitoring, using other vaccines as “placebos” rather than genuine saline, and with no testing of the cumulative effect of multiple simultaneous vaccines. Manufacturers openly admit vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” products, a designation that grants them protection while acknowledging inherent dangers. The act created a moral hazard where profits are privatized while risks are socialized. Injured children become the cost of doing business, absorbed by families and society rather than the companies profiting from mandatory vaccine programs. This perverse system ensures that vaccines will never become safer because manufacturers profit regardless of how many children are injured.

Question 23: What did the Harvard Pilgrim study reveal about VAERS reporting, and what does this mean for actual vaccine injury rates?

The Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare study, commissioned by the CDC, revealed that the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) captures less than 1% of actual vaccine injuries. This electronic surveillance system study, conducted from 2007-2010, found that while 1.4 million vaccine doses were given to 376,452 patients, resulting in 35,570 possible adverse reactions, only a tiny fraction were ever reported to VAERS. The study’s lead investigator, Dr. Lazarus Ross, concluded that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported” to the federal system supposedly monitoring vaccine safety. This means the actual number of vaccine injuries is 100 times higher than official figures.

The implications reveal systematic concealment of vaccine injuries. If VAERS shows thousands of deaths following vaccination, the actual number is hundreds of thousands. If VAERS shows tens of thousands of permanent disabilities, the real figure is millions. The CDC, rather than addressing this massive underreporting problem, abandoned the Harvard Pilgrim project and never implemented the electronic reporting system that would capture more injuries. Doctors are actively discouraged from reporting to VAERS, often unaware the system exists, and face no penalties for failing to report obvious vaccine injuries. Parents who try to report are told their child’s injury was coincidental. This systemic underreporting allows authorities to claim vaccines are safe based on VAERS data they know captures less than 1% of injuries. It’s deliberate maintenance of a system designed to hide vaccine injuries while creating the illusion of safety monitoring.

Question 24: How did the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine campaign unfold, and what lessons were ignored in subsequent vaccine campaigns?

The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine campaign stands as a cautionary tale of government incompetence, pharmaceutical profiteering, and media fear-mongering that was deliberately forgotten. When a single soldier died at Fort Dix from what appeared to be swine flu, CDC officials predicted a devastating pandemic comparable to 1918. President Gerald Ford, facing an election and wanting to appear decisive, announced a plan to vaccinate every American. The vaccine was rushed through development and testing in months. The predicted pandemic never materialized—not a single additional swine flu death occurred. The vaccine killed 25 people and caused over 500 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, leaving many permanently paralyzed. Mike Wallace’s 60 Minutes exposé revealed CDC officials knew about adverse reactions but hid them from the public.

Every lesson from this disaster was deliberately ignored in subsequent campaigns. The pattern repeated: officials hyped a minimal threat into existential crisis, rushed inadequately tested vaccines to market, ignored safety signals, and blamed victims when injuries occurred. The CDC’s own Dr. Anthony Morris, who warned against the swine flu vaccine, was fired for refusing to stay silent. This established the template: silence whistleblowers, maintain panic, never admit error. The swine flu fiasco proved government health agencies would sacrifice public safety for political objectives and pharmaceutical profits, yet this lesson was deliberately forgotten to enable future campaigns. When the next manufactured pandemic arrived, the same playbook was used: create fear, rush vaccines, mandate compliance, deny injuries, and destroy critics. The 1976 campaign proved that government health agencies sacrifice public safety for political objectives and pharmaceutical profits.

Question 25: What role do Merck and other pharmaceutical companies play in what the authors call the “Vaccine Cartel”?

Merck and other pharmaceutical giants operate as a vaccine cartel that controls research, regulation, and public perception through systematic corruption. Merck’s history reveals the pattern: from selling cocaine and morphine in the 1800s to corrupting science around vaccines today. The company funds medical schools, ensuring doctors are indoctrinated rather than educated about vaccines. They place former employees in regulatory agencies—the revolving door between pharma and FDA/CDC ensures industry-friendly decisions. They sponsor medical journals, controlling what gets published through advertising revenue and research grants. Studies questioning vaccine safety are rejected while ghost-written industry propaganda is published as peer-reviewed science.

The cartel extends beyond individual companies to encompass the entire vaccine enterprise. Pharmaceutical companies coordinate lobbying efforts, spending more on political influence than any other industry. They’ve captured medical associations like the American Academy of Pediatrics, which receives millions from vaccine manufacturers while claiming to represent children’s health. Media outlets, dependent on pharmaceutical advertising, refuse to cover vaccine injuries or question safety. The cartel destroys threats through coordinated campaigns—researchers who find problems are defunded, doctors who report injuries are delicensed, and parents who speak out are vilified as “anti-vaxxers.” Merck was convicted of fraud regarding Vioxx, Pfizer paid the largest criminal fine in history, yet these same companies are trusted with mandatory vaccine programs. The cartel ensures that vaccines remain profitable regardless of safety, that injuries are hidden rather than addressed, and that the vaccine program expands continuously, generating guaranteed profits from mandated consumption.

Question 26: How have diseases like scarlet fever, typhoid, and cholera disappeared without vaccines, and what does this reveal?

The disappearance of scarlet fever, typhoid, and cholera without vaccines proves that vaccines are not necessary to eliminate infectious diseases. Scarlet fever killed thousands of children annually in the 1800s but disappeared by 1950 without any vaccine ever being developed. Typhoid fever, which ravaged armies and cities throughout history, declined by 99% before vaccines were widely used, eliminated through water treatment and sanitation. Cholera, which caused devastating pandemics in the 19th century, was conquered by understanding its transmission through contaminated water and implementing proper sewage systems. These diseases didn’t disappear through medical intervention but through understanding disease transmission and improving living conditions.

This reveals the fundamental fraud underlying vaccine mythology. The same factors that eliminated non-vaccinated diseases—improved nutrition, sanitation, clean water, better housing, and reduced overcrowding—were responsible for the decline in diseases that later had vaccines developed for them. Measles, whooping cough, diphtheria, and other diseases were already declining precipitously before vaccines were introduced. Vaccines arrived at the end of this process and claimed credit for what social improvements had achieved. The fact that diseases without vaccines declined at identical rates to diseases with vaccines proves that vaccines were not the critical factor. This natural experiment, conducted across entire societies over decades, demonstrates that disease elimination comes from addressing root causes—poverty, malnutrition, and unsanitary conditions—not from injecting biological products. The vaccine industry has deliberately obscured this history because it undermines their entire business model: selling technical interventions for problems that social improvements had already solved.

Question 27: What is the difference between natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity, particularly for diseases like measles?

Natural immunity from measles infection provides lifelong protection superior to anything vaccines can achieve. When a child contracts measles naturally, the virus enters through the respiratory system, triggering a comprehensive immune response involving multiple layers of defense. The immune system learns to recognize and respond to all components of the virus, creating robust, permanent immunity. This immunity can be boosted through re-exposure to wild virus in the community, maintaining high antibody levels throughout life. Mothers who had natural measles pass strong antibodies to their babies, protecting infants during their most vulnerable months. Natural infection provides non-specific benefits, training the immune system in ways that protect against allergies, autoimmune diseases, and certain cancers later in life.

Vaccine-induced immunity is artificial and inferior in every measurable way. The vaccine introduces attenuated virus through injection, bypassing normal immune pathways and creating an incomplete response. Vaccine immunity wanes over time, requiring boosters that still don’t achieve the durability of natural immunity. Vaccinated mothers pass weak antibodies to their infants, leaving babies vulnerable during the period when measles is most dangerous. The vaccine has shifted measles from a childhood disease, when it’s mildest, to infants and adults, when complications are most severe. Mass vaccination has disrupted natural immunity patterns, creating populations of adults with waning immunity who are susceptible to severe disease. Countries with the highest vaccination rates experience measles outbreaks among vaccinated populations, proving vaccine failure. The push for vaccination over natural immunity represents the triumph of pharmaceutical profits over immunological science, replacing superior natural immunity with inferior artificial immunity that requires endless boosters.

Question 28: How does the one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule ignore genetic susceptibility and individual risk factors?

The CDC’s one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule is medical malpractice on a population scale, treating all children as identical biological units rather than unique individuals with varying susceptibilities. The schedule assumes every child can safely receive multiple vaccines simultaneously regardless of genetic makeup, family history, current health status, or environmental factors. Children with mitochondrial disorders, like Hannah Poling, suffer severe neurological regression from vaccines that other children tolerate. Those with family histories of autoimmune disease, allergies, or neurological conditions face elevated risks never assessed before vaccination. Premature infants receive the same doses as full-term babies despite immature immune and detoxification systems. Children fighting infections or recovering from illness are vaccinated on schedule without regard for their compromised state.

No screening exists to identify at-risk children before vaccination. Genetic markers for vaccine injury susceptibility have been identified—certain HLA types, MTHFR mutations, mitochondrial variations—but testing is never performed. Family history of vaccine reactions is ignored. Previous adverse reactions to vaccines are dismissed, and children are revaccinated despite clear warning signs. The schedule makes no adjustments for individual children who would benefit from delayed vaccination, single vaccines rather than combinations, or modified schedules. This assembly-line medicine violates the fundamental principle of individualized care. In any other medical context, administering powerful biological products without considering individual risk factors would be malpractice. The one-size-fits-all schedule exists not for medical reasons but for administrative convenience and pharmaceutical profits. It ensures maximum vaccine consumption regardless of individual risk, treating vaccine injuries as acceptable collateral damage rather than preventable tragedies that could be avoided through personalized medical care.

Question 29: What alternative approaches to disease prevention have been suppressed or ignored in favor of vaccination?

Throughout history, successful disease prevention strategies that don’t generate pharmaceutical profits have been systematically suppressed in favor of vaccination. The Leicester Method demonstrated that sanitation, isolation, and quarantine controlled smallpox better than vaccination, but this approach was abandoned because it didn’t generate revenue. Nutritional interventions like vitamin A for measles, vitamin D for respiratory infections, and vitamin C for various diseases are ignored despite proven effectiveness. These nutrients cost pennies and can’t be patented, making them worthless to pharmaceutical companies despite their disease-preventing power. Breastfeeding, which provides superior immune protection to infants, is undermined by pushing vaccines on newborns. Natural immunity, which provides superior and lasting protection, is denied in favor of inferior vaccine-induced immunity requiring endless boosters.

Public health measures that actually eliminated diseases—clean water, sewage treatment, improved housing, nutrition programs, poverty reduction—receive minimal funding compared to vaccine programs. Hygiene education, which prevents countless infections, is ignored in favor of trying to vaccinate against diseases spread by poor sanitation. Traditional practices like fever support, which allows the immune system to function optimally, are suppressed in favor of immediate medical intervention. Homeopathy, which showed success during historical epidemics, is ridiculed despite evidence of effectiveness. Environmental toxin reduction, addressing the root causes of immune dysfunction, is ignored while vaccines are pushed on increasingly unhealthy populations. These alternatives are suppressed not because they don’t work but because they work too well without generating profits. The vaccine industry has captured public health policy, ensuring that only profitable interventions are pursued while free or cheap alternatives are dismissed as “unscientific” despite centuries of proven success.

Question 30: How do vaccine advocates use fear, propaganda, and the “anti-vaxxer” label to silence legitimate safety questions?

The vaccine industry has perfected a propaganda system using fear, shame, and social ostracism to silence any questioning of vaccine safety. Every disease is portrayed as a death sentence regardless of actual risk—measles, which had a 0.01% mortality rate in well-nourished children before the vaccine, is presented as if it were Ebola. Parents are terrorized with images of iron lungs and dying children, never told that these diseases were mild in healthy populations or that mortality had declined 95% before vaccines. The fear campaign is synchronized across media, medical establishments, and government agencies, creating an echo chamber of terror that overwhelms rational risk assessment.

The “anti-vaxxer” label functions as modern heresy accusation, immediately discrediting anyone who questions any aspect of vaccine safety or efficacy. Doctors who report vaccine injuries are labeled anti-vaxxers and professionally destroyed, regardless of their support for safe vaccines. Parents whose children were injured by vaccines are dismissed as anti-vaxxers seeking someone to blame for genetic conditions. Scientists who find safety problems are branded anti-vaxxers and lose funding. The label is applied to anyone who suggests spacing out vaccines, requesting single vaccines instead of combinations, or wanting more safety studies. It’s a thought-terminating cliché designed to end discussion, not engage with legitimate concerns. The propaganda extends to portraying vaccine questioners as selfish, stupid, or dangerous to society—child killers who would bring back polio. Social media platforms ban vaccine safety discussions, doctors refuse to see unvaccinated patients, and families are torn apart by vaccine status. This is religious persecution, using social pressure and economic destruction to enforce compliance with a medical procedure that should require informed consent.

I appreciate you being here.

If you’ve found the content interesting, useful and maybe even helpful, please consider supporting it through a small paid subscription. While 99% of everything here is free, your paid subscription is important as it helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. It also helps keep it free for those that cannot afford to pay.

Please make full use of the Free Libraries.

Unbekoming Interview Library: Great interviews across a spectrum of important topics.

Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Concise summaries of important books.

Stories

I’m always in search of good stories, people with valuable expertise and helpful books. Please don’t hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com